LOL, what percent of the presidential historians are democrats. According to a study: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/may/24/republican-presidents-lag-in-historical-rankings/ liberal presidential historians far outnumber conservative. By as much as 8-1.
Being impeached(not removed from office) is supposed to invalidate 22 millions jobs created,record stock market,one of the best economies in US history,no major wars,budget surplus etc?
How could a presidential historian give a pass to a president being impeached for committing crimes in office and rate him in the top third of presidents.
One of the worst presidencies ever. So many scandals that there was even a new phrase coined as a result. Scandal fatigue. By your measure, democrat historians would rate Tammany Hall as a success because New York was a prosperous city.
Yeah because a budget surplus ,22 million jobs,roaring stock market etc are all bad.Lets see if Trump matches Bill's budget or economic numbers.
Overlooking the crimes HE committed, and taking credit for what the PRIVATE ECONOMY produced. And I can't help but notice that you included a budget surplus as an amazing achievement while at the same time the biggest deficits in history by obama are no big deal.