"Alcoholism poses as much a national health crisis in Russia today as it did during the Soviet Unionâs early 1980s, when up to 2 of every 5 men were considered alcoholics." http://www.mosnews.com/commentary/2005/12/15/alcoholism.shtml No need to hurry, take you time, use a dictionary, think about the quote, let me know what part of it you don't understand, I am here to help.
Yes, and I'm referring you back to my original question and comment (which you still have not come to terms with) that says that statistics today are NOTHING like what they were in Soviet times because Russians are not required to post data, and frequently shy away from any question answering whatsoever - because they are afraid it will lead them to trouble. So market data gathers (like IRI and Neilsen) who do so well in the West are continually struggling for a picture of Russia. They, themselves admit there is no way to get an accurate view within the current infrastructure. See, you're too busy trying to stuff half-assed stats down our throat that you still haven't addressed that point. But again, you'll just post some link that sights no sources again, or are we to believe the "Moscow Psychiatry Institute" has access to the country's data when large multi-million corps that specialize in data gathering cannot get it? Haha...yeah!
20 idiots in a country with the population of 150 mln people registering as Hobbits don't disqualify and invalidate the results of a valid research/statistics/census. Statistitians, pollsters and sociologists know precisely the persentage of Idiot Ivanoviches among normal people, they take them into account and adjust their results accordingly. Americans don't have to tell the truth to the pollsters either and many of them don't, yet most polls conducted by reputable polling groups are consistent, valid and accurate. How do you manage to make so many absolutely idiotic statements in one thread?
Did it say 20? Or is that another "fact" you're inventing for us? My point was that it was not an accurate test. It was a joke of a census test where people could fill out whatever they want, if they wanted to. And Russian's do not fill out data unless forced to (which is why the Soviets always had accurate data, they just didn't want to admit the truths). Why do you think the census guy in the article complained about being beaten, had dogs set on him and had people EAT their census tests? Hahah...that's not a test, and you cannot acertain accuracy from such stupidity. Well, YOU can, but the rest of the human race cannot. Just because the article leans in the direction you WANT it to does not make it fact. That's something you still need to learn. I'll bet - if you are a trader at all - you're one of those traders that only reads the news you feel backs up your position, and all those running contrary are "crap". Am I in the ballpark?
The soviet statistics was valid based on your own admission, according to it 40% of russian men were alcoholics in the 80s and everyone on this planet except you knows that things have not improved since then, they have actually got worse. Case closed. I'll let you have the last word cause frankly I am sick of your ignorance, stupidity and complete inability to back up your stubborn opinion with a single fact or research.
Sorry, mate. Just because you say "Case closed" doesn't make it so. Everyone knows? Wow...everyone. I cannot believe someone can be so ignorant of the world. So are you saying that life in general has gotten worse since the fall of communism or that alcoholism has gotten worse? I just want to make sure I address the right jackass statement. You're sick of my ignorance or simply are having trouble actually proving your statements with real world facts (not dddooo facts, real world ones)? Oh, incidently you agree with me when I admit that Soviet stats were accurate, but disagree with everything else. Leading me once again to believe that if something supports your point of view, it's fine. But those that don't, well they're all full of crap.
Am I correct in assuming there's relatively no chance of switching the Russian alcoholics debate to Russian female tennis stars?? No?? OK... Didn't think so. Uh... I like Hantuchova and Sharapova... for the record.
I don't agree or disagree with you, who do you think you are, an anonymous idiot on the internets. I agree with statistics, I agree with the Soviet Statistics and I agree with the Russian statistics, I am absolutely consistent in this respect. And if you can find a single russian or foreign official claiming that alcoholism situation in Russia has improved in the last 20 years - be my guest.
Hantuchova is not russian, she is Slovakian, I do like her though. Sharapova irritates the hell out of me, I am not sure why.