It's just a way to describe the condition of the coin (e.g. if a coin was laying around in a safe and all design is visible and the it's still shiny).
You realize both your statements here contradict each other. You ask people to question everything but then tell other posters here when they question you, that they do not understand what you are about. And how could anyone understand lunatic ravings? You off your meds? Autism runs strong in your family.
Hey man... I like reading Overnight. He's a little off sometimes but let's keep it civil, yeah? He is apparently losing money in USMCA, which can be tough on anyone.
actually they do use psychology to make their sites more addicting, according to the experts anyway. Soros apparently has sized things up correctly with regard to social media. e.g., https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/...e-psychology-behind-social-media-interactions
When I was employed in my position I received on average 50 emails a day and busy days could receive +100 a day. Coming home and turning on my computer was the last thing I wanted to do, even now after being retired, hate receiving emails. Nearly all my 'computer' work these days is on tablet and a chromebook which are not connected to emails. When people send me emails most often I will take days to reply, some reason just dislike so much.
yet you say: "Places like Facebook and Google are not comparable to gambling venues." Are you not laying blame on gambling venues but somehow not social media sites? I agree addiction comes from within, but those who take advantage of it (through whatever means and service provided) are not blameless.