More Than a Million May Lose Jobless Aid Due to Deficit Concern

Discussion in 'Economics' started by ASusilovic, Apr 29, 2010.

  1. i just wonder how many traders will lose their jobs because of low VIX
     
    #11     Apr 29, 2010
  2. The growing number of Americans on Gummint Assistance just adds to the Dems voter base.
     
    #12     Apr 29, 2010
  3. S2007S

    S2007S

    33 states out of money to fund jobless benefits
    By Hibah Yousuf, staff reporterApril 9, 2010: 2:26 PM ET


    NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- With unemployment still at a severe high, a majority of states have drained their jobless benefit funds, forcing them to borrow billions from the federal government to help out-of-work Americans.

    A total of 33 states and the Virgin Islands have depleted their funds and borrowed more than $38.7 billion to provide a safety net, according to a report released Thursday by the National Employment Law Project. Four others are at the brink of insolvency.


    Debt-challenged California has borrowed the most, totaling more than $8.4 billion, followed by Michigan and New York, which have loans worth more than $3 billion. Nine other states have borrowed at least $1 billion from the federal government.

    "The nation's financing system for jobless benefits is under unprecedented stress," said Andrew Stettner, deputy director of the New York-based advocacy group for the unemployed. "While the recession has certainly made things worse, this funding crisis has been developing for years."

    At the onset of the recession, only 19 states met the recommended funding level, which is one year of reserves equal to the highest amount of unemployment insurance paid out during prior recessions.

    Financing experts suggest that states build up their jobless benefit coffers during strong economic times so that they can draw from them during downturns.

    Federal and state governments collect money for unemployment benefits by taxing employers on a small portion of their employee wages. While total wages and weekly jobless benefit levels have been rising, governments haven't increased the taxable base wages at the same pace.
    0:00 /4:50Don't ask for a state job

    Instead, they adopted a "pay as you go" approach, keeping taxes and fund levels low during good times and raising taxes and cutting benefits when strapped for cash. That left many states with insufficient jobless funds to weather the recession.
    Jobless claims soar

    Of the 13 states that will likely be able to fund jobless benefits without borrowing from the feds, 10 of them followed the recommended financing tactic. That readied them for the recession, the National Employment Law Project concluded in its study.

    "The current crisis should compel policy makers to forge a new path to forward financing of the unemployment insurance program," Stettner said. "As the broke funds of 33 states makes clear, unemployment insurance reserves need to be stocked up before recessions hit so that states are prepared." To top of page
    States out of $$$ for the jobless
    Here's how much they’ve borrowed from the federal government.
    State Borrowed
    California $8.40 billion
    Michigan $3.78 billion
    New York $3.00 billion
    Pennsylvania $2.81 billion
    Ohio $2.23 billion
    North Carolina $2.14 billion
    Illinois $2.06 billion
    Texas $2.03 billion
    Indiana $1.81 billion
    New Jersey $1.55 billion
    Florida $1.50 billion
    Wisconsin $1.34 billion
    South Carolina $851 million
    Kentucky $760 million
    Missouri $687 million
    Minnesota $638 million
    Connecticut $422 million
    Georgia $337 million
    Nevada $331 million
    Arkansas $318 million
    Virginia $317 million
    Massachusetts $279 million
    Alabama $268 million
    Rhode Island $204 million
    Colorado $186 million
    Idaho $181 million
    Maryland $104 million
    Kansas $65 million
    New Hampshire $23 million
    South Dakota $23 million
    Vermont $23 million
    Arizona $22 million
    Virgin Islands $13 million
    Delaware $1 million
     
    #13     Apr 29, 2010
  4. I know a few jobless that get 570 a week and do not want to work, they have been on it a year and have 1 more left.
     
    #14     Apr 29, 2010
  5. what i can't grasp is how the unemployed manage to have enough money left from the employment paycheck to fill their car to drive to the mall to buy useless crap.
     
    #15     Apr 29, 2010
  6. Arnie

    Arnie

    The max is around $900/week in MA. Most people could get by on less, especially if they don't pay the mortgage. The ones that play by the rules are the suckers. Such is life in Obamanation.
     
    #16     Apr 29, 2010
  7. clacy

    clacy

    Think about it......

    Would you rather get $1,600/month to do absolutely nothing (or get a tan, or workout, or watch Oprah, etc)? Or get paid $2,500/month ($30k/yr) to bust your ass for boss, company, etc???

    It seems like a no-brainer, IMO.
     
    #17     Apr 29, 2010
  8. This really does play right into the political playbook. It's a race to capture the largest number of both disenfranchised and unemployed individuals who are captive to the government ALONG with growing the official sector via pay raises, supplemental hiring, all the while sticking the private sector with the bill. The bigger question is how close are we to the tipping point? and by tipping point I mean have we reached a majority status amongst those directly supported by government spending?

    If you have 39million individuals on food stamps, untold millions receiving 2 year unemployment, 1 in 5 individuals working for the government in some capacity, you know how these people will vote. They will vote to keep the gravy train coming. Those are staggering numbers and of course you have those on the fence and those who are facing foreclosure or in the midst of some hamstrung "workout" via a bank that is a quasi-governmental institution. Add those millions into the equation.
     
    #18     Apr 29, 2010
  9. olias

    olias

    couldn't the government do a better job of getting something for their money? All these people collecting unemployment should be picking up trash or some shit. lol I'm sure there's a lot more productive stuff they could be doing, but shouldn't we be talking about it?
     
    #19     Apr 29, 2010
  10. Nah, the Dems would just call you an Elitist Racist Hatemonger, and go on their merry way deconstructing the country.
     
    #20     Apr 29, 2010