%% GOOD, but that's also good for CA moving Companies Personaly, I love the outdoors, but like my mushrooms in CPB soup LOL. CA Host Larry Elder noted college loan debt forgivesness= ''reparations for rich white kids''LOL Funny + also funny when the SCOTUS smacked that down !!
Republican state? If the Republican Party was represented by Schwartzenegger, I'd be a Republican! Hell, even Reagan would be assaulted as a RINO today.
You are too young. From 1911 to 1939, all Governors of CA were Republicans. And you forgot Warren, Knight & Deukmejian. You forgot, Warren went on to become the chief justice of the SCOTUS.
My point is, California Republicans are considered RINO by MAGA standards. Trump is neither Democrat nor Republican, he is white christian nationalist.
39.29% of cities in the USA with over 100,000 people are in california too, so all things being equal 39.29% of the wealthiest cities should be in California by default.
Something isn't correct in the article, which speaks of cities with 40,000 households. The census defines household as 2.51 people, so about cities of 100,000 people. There are 336 cities with 100,000 people or more in the US, 74 (22%) are in CA. The article says more than 50% of the wealthiest cities are in CA, which would be at least 168 cities. https://www.statista.com/statistics/183648/average-size-of-households-in-the-us/ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lis...336,cities with populations exceeding 100,000.
What I find more interesting is that the US, with a population of 333 million has 336 cities of more than 100k people (5 states have no cities of 100k+). By comparison, Europe with a population of 746 million has 1000 cities of more than 100k people. Canada, with 39 million people has almost 60 cities of 100k+ population. To understand MAGA popularity, you need to understand demographics. The US is more rural than other western nations (21%), thus more conservative and more segregated (76% white) despite the country's overall diversity. 27% of the population lives in urban settings and 80% are now majority non white. The big differentiator (and probably explains the discrepancy in the article) is suburbia (neither urban nor rural), which represents 52% of the US population. Suburbia is white dominant (62%) although dropping every year as the nation's population grows. https://ruralinnovation.us/blog/who...ic data is,as relatively homogenous and white.
the wealthiest cities is a subset of of the 336. So the wealthiest cities could only number 50 of which 25 are in California. Venn diagrams dude.