More like discarding made up fake news by a tabloid who have been caught lying multiple times. But you already knew that, as long as it supports your narrative, you are OK with fake news.
What was fake about Wikipedia banning DailyMail as fake news? What is fake about DailyMail paying millions in damages to Melania Trump for calling her a prostitute?
First she's Asian. In your language, she's "yellow," not "brown." Second, Charlottesville was about racism, no rational person equated the typical southern red-white-and-blue crowd with the KKK. The statue was just an excuse for the racists to congregate. And you are right about the media demonizing people and the potential risks that can cause. That's why so many liberals are fighting alt-right websites that spew hateful lies about muslims and immigrants.
Asians can be "brown" or "yellow", depending on the latitude. The south is brown/tan in color, and the north is white as white can be. Yellow is not in my vocabulary. I wonder why it is in yours. "...spew hateful lies about muslims and immigrants". I'm aware of shooters, potential shooters, and inciters of shooters who spew hateful lies about people who cite facts and statistics about muslims and immigrants as they relate to the economy and/or security of their nation.
I'm sure you consider light-skinned Arabs, "white" like you do Scandinavians. Your run-on sentence is what I expected to hear from you.
It seems somewhat odd to me that the left has ended up adopting muslims as one of their protected groups. In doing so, they evicted a former favorite, jews. Anti-Semitism complaints are now deemed tiresome by the left, unless directed at right wing figures. Muslims as a group are extreme versions of everything the left detests about traditional Christians, except for the crucial factor they are not southern republicans. Muslims are intolerant religious bigots with medieval views on virtually every leftwing social hot button issue. Yet leftists angrily demand vast increases in muslim immigration and accuse Pres. Trump of being Hitler for disagreeing. It seems odd, almost like a lot of groups are getting paid off to push the muslim line.
I'm aware that when packs of brown Pakistani Muslims were systematically entrapping, blackmailing, beating up, drugging and raping young and underage girls of Rotherham for years, they were called "Asians". I'm also aware that Mo-bombed was light skinned enough to feel himself supremacist over blacks. Besides that, what was your point except to admit you lose this argument?
There is no one on the left "angrily demanding vast increases in muslim immigration." There is a huge chasm between a "Muslim ban" and "vast increases in muslim immigration."