More left wing violence at the G20 summit.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Hello, Jun 30, 2010.

  1. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    I like how the British handled Boston rioters on March 5, 1770 better.
     
    #11     Jun 30, 2010
  2. Fascinating posts from a gaggle of idiots who have recently been making noises about civil war, armed rebellion and some such. Six of one, half dozen of the other.
     
    #12     Jun 30, 2010
  3. Hello

    Hello

    Particularly fascinating, seeing as how nothing ever happened from the right. Be a man and admit for once in your life that Left wing idiots are the cause of destruction time and time again.
     
    #13     Jun 30, 2010
  4. Bullshit. Those are not left wingers. They're thugs and criminals who should be dealt with as thugs and criminals. The non-violent among them are just misguided or stupid.

    You goofballs need to get your story straight. You piss on guys like Soros, who wants global cooperation, and then associate him with anarchists? You call them BOTH "left?"
     
    #14     Jun 30, 2010
  5. Hello

    Hello

    They were flying flags that said down with capitalism, red flags, and flags with pictures of Mao.....

    Why dont these supposed thugs show up at right wing rallies?

    Why havent any of these thugs managed to infiltrate a right wing rally??

    ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!?!?!?!
     
    #15     Jun 30, 2010
  6. That is a ridiculous response to the topic. You cannot even condemn the violence by the leftist anti-capitalists. Did you participate in the “protests” at the G20?
     
    #16     Jun 30, 2010

  7. Careful your cognitive dissonance is veering towards hilariously pathological in order to distance your idiot-ology from theirs.

    :D
     
    #17     Jun 30, 2010
  8. Hello

    Hello

    I suspect that Gabfly1's definition of a thug only pertains to right wingers, just as his definition of a racist only pertains to right wingers, these guys are fucking lunatics, time and time again they come out and readily admit that it is only bad when it comes from one side.

    Do you (gabfly1) honestly think that if a mass shooting occured at a tea party rally you would write it off as a bunch of loonies who infiltrated a tea party rally? Give your head a shake you idiot.

    The hopeless partisanship expressed by guys like you is ludicrous, i have outed you time and time again, and you will never admit that you are wrong in any way.
     
    #18     Jun 30, 2010
  9. Hello

    Hello

    Gabfly1's definition of racism basically states that anyone who agrees with someone he has accused of racism is infact a racist, even though there has never even been a politically incorrect statement from "said" person.

     
    #19     Jun 30, 2010
  10. Hello

    Hello

    Then the other day he proclaimed "Bugscoe" is a racist, for saying things far less offensive than Bill Maher, just after Bill Maher had proclaimed he wants a black president with a gun at his hip to attack BP, so that Obama could be a real black president. In his eyes "Bugscoe" is on parole, and thus he (bugscoe) doesnt deserve a chance to explain himself, but Bill Maher is not racist for making such statements.

    Also the other day Omegapoint made a statement that Right wing "anti semitism" is pure "biggotry and hatred." While he stated that left wing anti semitism is justified because it is based on israels occupation of palestine.

    You cant even make this kind of shit up, these lefties simply make the rules up as they go, as long as it supports the false assumption in their head that all left wingers are GOOD!!! And all right wingers are racist violent assholes.

    What guys like Gabfly1 say has no bearing on reality whatsoever.
     
    #20     Jun 30, 2010