Moonbat Ideology now required reading

Discussion in 'Politics' started by hapaboy, Oct 12, 2006.

  1. im sorry.. you reject the scooped out theory put out by NIST. so the fire was the main culprit? although fire has never collapsed a modern bldg before ever in modern history. FIRE.... all i saw was black smoke in that one video... that means it was oxygen starved, not exactly hot. amazing that it was able to simulate a symmetrically designed professional controlled demolition. maybe an act of god huh? i am still waiting for the bldg to fall that was hit by cory lidle. LOL LOL LOL idiot!!!!!!!
     
    #61     Oct 15, 2006
  2. Still waiting for an answer to my question. How does a demo crew do all the work required to topple such a building and go completely un-noticed by thousands of people for a period that would span several weeks?
    The in-ability and/or unwillingness to address such a straight-forward, common sense question, shows a political bias bordering on insanity.
     
    #62     Oct 15, 2006
  3. i posted a video brainiac. you mentioned 50,000 people... LOL LOL LOL... ummmmmmmmmmmmmm... do they all work at night?

    im still waiting for an explanation for the squib 40 floors below the initial collapse... trust me i know why you have failed.
     
    #63     Oct 15, 2006
  4. explain where the cement floors went if they pancaked??? this is so simple... it was all dust. therefore there was no mass to force the remaining floors down. show me these pancaked floors. they weren't there.
     
    #64     Oct 15, 2006
  5. My God! Can anyone be this stupid? The answer is no, a person cannot be this stupid, which means one can only conclude you have a political bias that obscures even the most elementary facts. To continue a debate with a person such as yourself is just too painful for any thinking person. So long and good luck in your life. You're gonna' need it!
     
    #65     Oct 15, 2006
  6. Wow, you're a psychic too.

    Now you say what I think? LMAO, what an idiot...

    BTW, still waiting for links to your claims. "The resaerch is out there" according to you. So let's see it.

    Otherwise, one word can describe you ...... OWNED !!
     
    #66     Oct 15, 2006
  7. captaindork... there are multiple ways a team working undercover could have wired the bldg with explosives. do you really think they are going to do so in the middle of the day wearing ACME suits? LOL LOL LOL honestly i hope you dont trade for a living....
     
    #67     Oct 15, 2006
  8. Eloquently put....

    I think I'll wait for Ratturd to post a link backing his 90% assertion before I reply to him again.

    For there's no sense discussing anything with someone that's been OWNED!!!!!
     
    #68     Oct 15, 2006
  9. i have yet to get an answer on my first post.... loser
     
    #69     Oct 15, 2006
  10. wait... osama got NORAD to stand down by scheduling a drill that morning. wow.. that osama is one crafty sob. just like the london bombings fake drill... hmmmm... sounds familiar.
     
    #70     Oct 15, 2006