It's just that you're embarassing yourself with your CT theories. www.debunking911.com www.911myths.com
oh geez... you're back. and i see the obselete links you have posted. dude... wake up.. no one is spewing that pancake crap anymore. that was a pitiful defense. you can do better than that.
So then it should be easy for you to knock it down, point by point. Let's see what you've got, other than your beliefs.
explain the squib that is appx 35-40 floors below the initial collapse. <embed style="width:400px; height:326px;" id="VideoPlayback" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=1798029680029341757&hl=en"> </embed>
here's the mecca of all researchers.... LOL LOL LOL. talk about embarrassing. <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/t0uVwS544Rg"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/t0uVwS544Rg" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
Why is it that every theory is only met with another theory to "debunk" it, filled with opinions only. Your debunk theories no more debunk than the conspiracy theories prove their case. This reminds me of the global warming debate... Scientists on both sides of the issue reaching different conclusions based on the facts... I take no position, beyond the number of anomalies that happened on 9/11, which would lead anyone with an open mind to wonder why...