Those you list gave him the power, not the right to attack. That's where the republiklans stumble, doing the right thing once they have the power...
you got me. I should pay more attention to the words I choose. The "right" certainly was a poor choice. In any event, you could transparently juxtapose hundreds of comments regarding the threat of Iraq from Bush and that list, as we've already seen ... Honestly, I can't wait til Bush leaves office ... I'd like to see another split, The right owns the legislature, and the Left runs the Executive branch. Which probably won't happen because rather than focus on anything constructive, the Left is doing little but comparing bush to Hitler, Suddam, and the little nut from North Korea, making it impossible to take them seriously.
The right defines where the right, left, and center are these days, and the Fox News mind controlled sheeple buy into that crapola. The klannish point to left wing fringe elements and deem that to be the real democratic party, which it isn't. When do we ever hear of right wing extremist from the klannish? Uhhh, never. As if...
http://www.cnn.com/2006/EDUCATION/10/11/instructor.sept.11.ap/index.html From the CNN article: One essay Barrett is requiring students to read is entitled: "A Clash Between Justice and Greed," and argues that conflicts between Islam and the western world were made up after the "collapse of the Soviet Union to justify U.S. 'defense' spending, and to provide a pretext of controlling the world's resources." Satisfied now, Nitro, or do you think I manufactured the article?
Not exactly. The left ran Joe L out on a rail, and many have labeled Hillary Clinton a right-winger in disguise. Zel Miller was a lifelong respected Democrat before the party was highjacked by lunatics and hollywood celebrities. We might not hear about 'right-wing extremists' as much, because compared to defending the unborn, calling Bush the world's greatest terrorist and the US the root of all the world's problems appears down-right insane. Things would be better if we had a three party system, The Right, the moderate Left and the Looney Left. The esteemed professor mentioned in the first post could be the LLNC chairperson.
Your denial of an extreme right wing, as evidence by the "3 party system" is obviously proof of your particular bias, and evidence of how the right has framed the debate...and the dittoheaded Fox News klannish and comatose viewers accept it as fact.
I am satisfied. But I thought you were talking about his 9/11 article as being required reading. nitro
Yes you are right. I am biased. Proudly so, I've been paying attention. Far Leftists frighten me, mostly because of their talk of socializing things, restricitng private property,and of course their fixation with taxing people and "improving" our lives. I LIKE people on the far right, primarily because their main concern is NOT BEING FUCKED WITH BY THE GOVERNMENT. I'll sum up my opinion of the far-left by suggesting a campaing slogan for them. "Tax The Evil Rich! The US is full of capatlist- facist pigs that will consume the world!"
Unlike you, I see a far left, a far right, and most folks in between. If you want to identify with far right, that's your choice...
Nice try. But you're fllat out wrong...again. The main reason the Dems lose election after election is because they have alienated the middle class by appealing to their base, which is a collection ultra left/socialists/communists organizations. I'd ask you to prove your statement but I'm sure all I'd get is "as hominem, neocon, straw man......" ad nauseum.