Money Mangers Marketing

Discussion in 'Professional Trading' started by LongView, Mar 10, 2006.

  1. Thank ssb11 and bolterv for the excellence inputs.
     
    #111     Nov 18, 2009
  2. Perhaps you're not holding balances in USD :). 0% paid right now, in any tier.

     
    #112     Nov 18, 2009
  3. I don't think the average American has "friends and family" with $5 million of trading capital they are willing to risk with an unknown trading newbie...

    "Hi - I am starting out to trade other people's money. Do you want to put $100,000 into my venture?" (I know, I know - Madoff lost a lot of people's money, but I am different - my ideas work on sim and paper trading. Seriously - look at my 6 month backtest results!!!)

    I would say you need to hack this number down by 95+%. Like $75,000 maybe...

    And someone who starts risking the money of friends and family is a serious fool. A really serious fool.

    You have a person who cannot support himself on his trading (warning #1).

    But he has a "profitable idea" that just needs OPM. (warning #2)

    It is well believed that 95+% of traders lose their money (warning #3)

    But this trader "is different" (warning #4)

    This person has no problem risking the money of those he cares about, those who trust him (warning #5)

    ETC. ETC.
     
    #113     Nov 18, 2009
  4. ChrisM

    ChrisM

    Good practice here is to calculate performance always net of your standard fees even if you give discounts to early investors.
     
    #114     Nov 18, 2009
  5. Assuming:

    1. Your CTA program (the Program) inception data is 1/1/2005.
    2. The disclosure document (dated 1/1/2005) specifies the fee is 1/10.
    3. Before 1/1/2008, you have 10 client accounts.
    4. You charge 1/10 to all such 10 client accounts.
    5. On 1/1/2008, you like increase your fee schedule.
    6. The disclosure document (dated 1/1/2008) specifies the new fee is 2/20.
    7. Any client accounts after 1/1/2008 will be charged 2/20.
    8. However, the first 10 client account opened before 1/1/2008 will still be charged 1/10 per agreement, since you can not (or would not want to) go back to ask them to sign a new agreement to increase your fee from 1/10 to 2/20.

    Based on the above assumptions,

    1. Before 1/1/2008, the compose performance table on any DD dated before 1/1/2008, will still based on 1/10.
    2. However, after 1/1/2008, how are you going to calculate your performance? How do you do this in real live?
     
    #115     Nov 18, 2009
  6. bolter

    bolter

    Nihao,

    Wo hun hao (excuse my clumsy Mandarin).

    Good question, and it beomes even more complicated when you are up and running and have to start dealing with new money, redemptions, HWM's and performance fees on a monthly basis.

    I'm more familiar with this issue under a traditional offshore managed futures hedge fund structure as opposed to a CTA, however I'll share what I know.

    As a CTA your investment vehicle is not a single "fund" per se. Rather all your clients will have an account at your brokers (generally) that you trade for them. You must track performance for each account independently.

    Worthwhile to note that performance for a CTA can be highly segmented - for example this client wants more leverage, this client wants more expsoure to energy products, this one wants a commodities only portfolio etc.

    Therefore you will need to use a model account (don't call it that) with (say) partners funds as the basis for your track record that is generally representative of your trading strategy.

    Do some research on NAV (net asset value) calulations, and have a good sniff around the NFA website.

    All the best.

    bolter
     
    #116     Nov 18, 2009
  7. ChrisM

    ChrisM

    The best is to calculate your performance as 2/20 from the beginning no matter what you charge your clients.
     
    #117     Nov 19, 2009
  8. exaltedangel09

    exaltedangel09 Guest

    I'm going to let you finish, but this may be one of the most informative threads on hedge funds of ALL time.

    Thank you to everyone who contributed.
     
    #118     Nov 21, 2009
  9. Great thread, thought I would try to revive it.

    Pursue and build relationships with small family offices and UHNW's--- forget institutions-a waste of time. wise words.
     
    #119     Jul 25, 2012
  10. Epic

    Epic

    Yes it is a pretty good thread, but a bit outdated now. The alternative investment world has shifted significantly and fundraising along with it.
     
    #120     Jul 25, 2012