You have already distinguished yourself as a peer of the realm in faith-based science, and now you have distinguished yourself even further in faith-based economics. Parody, thy name is jem.
Careful. When you speak of something you know nothing about you risk being seen for what you are. Surely you don't want that. Please, don't continue.
when you lose on the facts... you turn into a true troll. lets review.. 1. I produced charts showing that revenue went up after tax cuts - proving you to be a lying fool. I produced Nobel prize winners stating there is no known pathway from non life to life. Hence no proof we evolved from goo or any other inorganic material. In fact, many top scientists state there was not enough time on earth for us to have evolved from inorganic matter. I can't help it, if the facts of science interfere with your whacko socialist beliefs and that when I point out science to you, you look like a fool.
yes, lets. Did you even look at the link posted earlier by Ricter that factually and discriptively blows your nonsense right out of the water: http://www.slate.com/articles/busin...x_cuts_ever_increase_government_revenues.html You write this: And then you try to reduce a complex multivariate scenario down to the two variables of your choice while ignoring the other salient variables and context entirely, and EVEN THEN getting it wrong. I guess that means <120 for you. I'm further guessing well less than.
Face the fact that your knowledge of economics is entirely limited to a series of nonsensical sound bites. Embrace this reality and stick to being a space cadet.