another leftist with failed arguments pulls out the insult card first. it is so predictable. (richter you really need to become a libertarian, your leftist pals have no integrity.)
if a and b commence at the same time and a and b destroy the wealth of the working... through inflation and taxation... How the hell did america bring back a private central bank anyway. Do you think it was just and random act? Do you think it was part of a plan which had to operate on many complex levels?
This from the guy who chooses to ignore the disproportionate increase in the national debt under the Reagan administration, choosing to look only at revenues (while ignoring the disproportionate outlays that helped make them happen). You think this is an apples-and-oranges thing? Seriously? You don't think the 185% increase in the national debt factors into the equation? This from the guy who sees no relevance in the difference between the top marginal tax rate in the '60s, decreased from 90% to 70%, and the current 35%. The current top marginal rate is now HALF of what it was in the '60s. And you wish to make apples-to-apples policy comparisons? Seriously? Jem, seek help.
I did not ignore anything. You stated tax cuts do not work. I present facts... that revenue increases followed tax cuts. Now you are trying to come up with excuses. If I tell you that the tax cuts which followed WWII were followed by revenue increases - you will come up with other facts. I am sure the same will be done with the 20s cuts. At some point in the regression analysis you would have to realize that yes... revenues can go up after tax cuts. You have to have an IQ high enough to think in systems... ( I am told that occurs about 120 and above.) You have to be bright enough to understand the tax vs revenue curve means sometimes cuts would increase revenue and sometimes they would not. You have to realize the leftist rhetoric that tax cuts do not work is pure bullshit. Tax cuts may work to increase revenue. Ricter has an IQ high enough to understand that... when I made arguments about the tax vs revenue curve he immediately made intelligent comments about taking arguments to the extreme. I immediately knew he understood, we had a civil discussion. I am not sure if you are ignorant, low IQ or just a leftist bullshitter. But you are wrong when you say tax cuts do not increase revenue. History shows they have and anyone who thinks in systems knows at some point on the curve they must. If you do not understand that there are ways to increase your mental capacity.
Find one Fed chairman, someone with access to the kind of data and information to make a reasoned observation in this regard, who ever agreed that tax cuts pay for themselves. Any one of them will do. Just one. At any time in history. Take your time. I'll wait. Or are/were they all IQ-deprived leftists?