Miss California Assailed By Gays For Defending Marriage

Discussion in 'Politics' started by AAAintheBeltway, Apr 20, 2009.

  1. Since you phobes have already identified one another with your holier-than-thou ritual mating dance, why don't you just get it over with and make out already?
     
    #81     Apr 21, 2009
  2. WTL

    WTL

    Then simply change it so that it is that easy. No constitutional amendments and no moral posturing. We dont even have to condone gay culture or sex, just establish equal protection. It would be a type of civil union I suppose, good article you linked btw.

    If people werent just trying to shit on each other, both sides, we could get this solved easily.
     
    #82     Apr 21, 2009
  3. Someone needs to bitch slap this Perez Hilton dumbshit.

    Who decided to let him spring a trap question on Ms. California?

    Good for her for sticking to her convictions. She's better off not winning a PC competition anyways.

    Next year, they should open up the competition to trannies.
     
    #83     Apr 21, 2009
  4. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Well then to be fair I suppose I should change my comment as well.

    BO IS a dumb cunt.

    Hows that for fairness?
     
    #84     Apr 21, 2009
  5. Agreed.
    And thank you about the link. :)

    I doubt that many here ( the usual morons ) even read through the hypothetical example of how contracts wouldn't necessarily "solve" the issue from an equality sense in regards to same-sex marraige. For them, they already have their minds made up and aren't interested in examining the real facts.

    In any event, the link is certainly a good read and instructive in highlighting the fact that heterosexual couples that spend a mere $20 for their marraige "contract" are way ahead of the game when it comes to dealing with financial assets.

    In fact, nothing beats the contract of marriage when it comes to taxation and the distribution of assets.

    It's not even close.
     
    #85     Apr 21, 2009
  6. Mercor

    Mercor

    There must be some Homo lawyer who does Pro Bono work.

    Certainly if the Homo's were only interested in making legal contracts some non-profits would provide the service.

    ......Butt(hole) we all know that Homo's desperately need to have the word marriage in order to try to equalize this behavior with the 98% of normal people.
     
    #86     Apr 21, 2009
  7. So called "normal" people are failing in marriages to the tune of near 50%, affairs by so called "normal" people in marriages are near 75%...

    Greater than one in 10 Americans is taking anti depressants...

    Yessssirreee, normal is working out so well in America...

     
    #87     Apr 21, 2009
  8. Why would heterosexuals wish to deny gays all of that HAPPINESS? :D

    Doesn't make any sense.

    Don't gays deserve an opportunity to be just as unhappy and miserable?
     
    #88     Apr 21, 2009
  9. There are a bunch of morons here who are blindly gay bashing, but the issue I was addressing was whether the question AND response to the question Perez Hilton perpetuated regarding Ms. California was fair in the least, and I stated it wasn't, and that Perez Hilton is an idiot to hijack the Ms. USA competition to serve his apparent one issue agenda.

    Ms. California's answer was consistent with her personal belief, and there was no malice within it.

    Not only that, she expressed reasonableness and intelligence in expressing her opinion, whether one agreed with it, or not.

    That's the issue.
     
    #89     Apr 21, 2009
  10. You're correct on all counts....
     
    #90     Apr 21, 2009