Oh yaz, yo man Lurry? Looka dis pitcher. He sebetty yar ole? Cass dun seen um nekkid. He doan use de greekian fummula wun own he ballz lak he dew own he haid. Ole mens? Deys mah speshty. Deys all tawk. An no akshun. Me pay him? Fuk know! Him pay me! Tradurs? Ah nose um. Soons dey enters, dey caint hold. Long ma black ass! Deys awl shoat!
I'm genuine - nothing to do with hypostumus. I haven't been to this site for several months but have quite a long history of posts prior to that, mainly on the subject of trendfollowing.
Right...If you want to find a 'brother' I suggest you go ring the Whitehouse. It's full of brothers there. One could imagine that, a philosopher like you claim to be, could find a cleaner ass to brownnose than Larry Williams'. I was conned out of $40 for a book 25 years ago, and with all the inflation, and opportunity loss... it adds up. Imagine if I could make 10,000% per year on those $40. That's why I bought the book. Silly me. I take all cons seriously. It's how I make my fortunes. Conning others is my multiple stream of income. That I conned myself buying that book is a serious work of art. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B81afxJcwFw&feature=related In fact, Larry would have to pay a seriously big premium over the cost of the book (10,000% per year compounded for 25 years) to get it back from me. "The book", as it is now known in the family, has become a heirloom. Some stupid outsiders have even attributed magical powers to it. I let them do all the hard work.
Hehehe.... If you can trade, trade.... If you can't, then start a fight on ET that you can win.... I think I will be Lurry W. Illiams and go nuts on this thread.
I found Larry's explanation about the Australian bail laws being different to be partly (but not entirely) convincing. I just don't have any further comments about that. Based on what I've read, LW's long career strikes me as one in which very serious money HAS been made, often really impressive returns in short periods, but ultimately he has no real ability to hang onto his gains. I think he understands the theory of risk management inside out but can't actually apply it in practice (the two are TOTALLY different). He's also on record has having said that he teaches because it's steady, reliable income and in trading you have no idea when you're actually going to make money. Truer words have never been spoken. And I admire the candour.
The 'candour' may be fine, an act of humility probably after a huge loss, but there are truer words that have been spoken about trading and life. By me, for example.
Oh, so there is, in fact, only one literate member here at ET? Brilliant. Perhaps your department should be floors or windows.