Michael Barone: Romney Wins Handily

Discussion in 'Politics' started by pspr, Nov 3, 2012.

  1. pspr


    Fundamentals usually prevail in American elections. That's bad news for Barack Obama. True, Americans want to think well of their presidents and many think it would be bad if Americans were perceived as rejecting the first black president.

    But it's also true that most voters oppose Obama's major policies and consider unsatisfactory the very sluggish economic recovery -- Friday's jobs report showed an unemployment uptick.

    Also, both national and target state polls show that independents, voters who don't identify themselves as Democrats or Republicans, break for Romney.

    That might not matter if Democrats outnumbered Republicans by 39 to 32 percent, as they did in the 2008 exit poll. But just about every indicator suggests that Republicans are more enthusiastic about voting -- and about their candidate -- than they were in 2008, and Democrats are less so.

    That's been apparent in early or absentee voting, in which Democrats trail their 2008 numbers in target states Virginia, Ohio, Iowa and Nevada.

    The Obama campaign strategy, from the beginning, has recognized these handicaps, running barrages of early anti-Romney ads in states that Obama carried narrowly. But other states, not so heavily barraged, have come into contention.

    Which candidate will get the electoral votes of the target states? I'll go out on a limb and predict them, in ascending order of 2008 Obama percentages -- fully aware that I'm likely to get some wrong.

    Indiana (11 electoral votes). Uncontested. Romney.

    North Carolina (15 electoral votes). Obama has abandoned this target. Romney.

    Florida (29). The biggest target state has trended Romney since the Denver debate. I don't see any segment of the electorate favoring Obama more than in 2008, and I see some (South Florida Jews) favoring him less. Romney.

    Ohio (18). The anti-Romney auto bailout ads have Obama running well enough among blue-collar voters for him to lead most polls. But many polls anticipate a more Democratic electorate than in 2008. Early voting tells another story, and so does the registration decline in Cleveland's Cuyahoga County. In 2004, intensity among rural, small -town and evangelical voters, undetected by political reporters who don't mix in such circles, produced a narrow Bush victory. I see that happening again. Romney.

    Virginia (13). Post-debate polling mildly favors Romney, and early voting is way down in heavily Democratic Arlington, Alexandria, Richmond and Norfolk. Northern Virginia Asians may trend Romney. Romney.

    Colorado (9). Unlike 2008, registered Republicans outnumber registered Democrats, and more Republicans than Democrats have voted early. The Republican trend in 2010 was squandered by weak candidates for governor and senator. Not this time. Romney.

    Iowa (6). The unexpected Romney endorsements by the Des Moines Register and three other newspapers gave voice to buyer's remorse in a state Obama carried by 10 points. Democrats' traditional margin in early voting has declined. Romney.

    Minnesota (10). A surprise last-minute media buy for the Romney campaign. But probably a bridge too far. Obama.

    New Hampshire (4). Polls are very tight here. I think superior Republican intensity will prevail. Romney.

    Pennsylvania (20). Everyone would have picked Obama two weeks ago. I think higher turnout in pro-coal Western Pennsylvania and higher Republican percentages in the Philadelphia suburbs could produce a surprise. The Romney team evidently thinks so too. Their investment in TV time is too expensive to be a mere feint, and, as this is written, Romney is planning a Sunday event in Bucks County outside Philly. Wobbling on my limb, Romney.

    Nevada (6). Democratic early-voting turnout is down from 2008 in Las Vegas' Clark County, 70 percent of the state. But the casino unions' turnout machine on Election Day re-elected an unpopular Harry Reid in 2010, and I think they'll get enough Latinos and Filipinos out this time. Obama.

    Wisconsin (10). Recent polling is discouraging for Republicans. But Gov. Scott Walker handily survived the recall effort in June with a great organizational push. Democrats depend heavily on margins in inner-city Milwaukee (population down) and the Madison university community. But early voting is down in university towns in other states. The Obama campaign is prepared to turn out a big student vote, but you don't see many Obama signs on campuses. Romney.

    Oregon (7), New Mexico (5), New Jersey (14). Uncontested. Obama.

    Michigan (16). Romney chose Pennsylvania, where there's no auto bailout issue. Obama.

    Bottom line: Romney 315, Obama 223. That sounds high for Romney. But he could drop Pennsylvania and Wisconsin and still win the election.

  2. pspr


    We always talk about the independent, swing vote in elections because those tend to be the persuadables. But party ID numbers matter as well, because those partisan voters tend to split better than 90/10 for their party.

    It is for that reason that Gallup’s new partisan ID split, one that mimics what Rasmussen has been saying all along, predicts nothing less than doom for the Democrats, and a solid, national win for Mitt Romney this year.

  3. The Barone post must be from a month ago. It can't be based on current data.

    Friday's polls from the swing states were overwhelmingly pro-Obama: 19 for Obama, 2 ties, and 1 for Romney (Florida).

    Romney's odds are slipping day by day. Not a good sign.
  4. Lucrum


    If you don't mind me asking, what planet do you live on?
  5. pspr


    LOL Smiley.

    The story is from Friday Nov. 2nd. I guess you didn't read the article or your questions would have been answered. Sorry to bust your Obama bubble.

    Polls often get volitile on the weekend before the election. Undecided voters usually swing to the challenger Mon and Tue. Possibly by 3-5 pts. or more.
  6. I don't read articles from political blowhards.

    I care about data.

    And the data from Friday don't support Barone's case.

    We'll see about the data from Saturday, Sunday, Monday, and Tuesday.
  7. pspr


    The only blowhard is you. If you had a clue or would read you wouldn't ask stupid questions.

    Besides, Barrone is widely respected. When he says something about the way states are falling one should listen.
  8. gtor514


    Yeah, you can't get more respected than Barrone. He actually works for the networks during election night and makes the call for the winner of each race. I'm surprised he's putting his reputation out on limb like this so close to the election unless he's confident with his own numbers. If there is anybody who knows how to read an election it would be him.

    I remember in 2000 during Bush/Gore when all the other networks called Florida for Gore before the polls in Florida had even closed, Barrone said the race was too close and refused to give it to Gore. He was right.
  9. If Romney wins, there can only be one conclusion. There really is a mass media conspiracy to support the messiah at any price, even at the costs of press independence and destroying the united states.
  10. Sorry but the media complicit bengazi coverup has proven your worst fears.
    #10     Nov 3, 2012