Between them, they possibly do. The money has to go somewhere. We could assume that, again, of those 32 points, there is a tiny minority that outperforms the majority with absolutely exceptional performances. Jack Hershey, for example, could be one of them. Looking through his theories, there seems a lot more truth in them than I can currently even conceptualize. I'm just starting to work with my own adaptive matrices, created by a kind of formula for parallel sector channel re-replication. They work scaryingly well. But specifically the theory of market points migrating rather than jumping is probably the most revolutionary of all. This concept is so blasphemical of current perception it's not funny. It basically exploits all the other traders on a consistent basis. With a background like that, I indeed wouldn't be surprised if he made a lot, and I'm saying a shit-lot more than any of us can even conceptualize. 32 points would be either a point to end or a point to start. We don't know. But one thing is for sure : The limits are within yourself. The higher your accepted limit, the better. Always look what's ahead of you. Watch out for powerful minds crossing your way, and take them for all they're worth when you meet them. Learn, before they start exploiting you, too. Or you might be left with nothing one day. Opportunity doesn't stay forever. Make sure you see it when it comes. Compliments, ~Scientist
P.S: Find enclosed one of the matrices constructed by me of the ES. The beauty is that it isn't an arbitrary process like for example regression channels. The matrix forces you to do the right thing, because every square has to be the same size! So this is a lot harder than applying regression channels, but a lot more accurate, too. You just have to figure out the parameters All that said, I think it's quite funny how this is basically a "Hershey Matrix" turned by 45 degrees. I think Jacks' matrices are square, rather than "diamond", so this really could get very interesting - LOL. One matrix versus the other. Do they both work? To be or not to be, that is the question here.... ~The Scientist
No. The Matrix is done with the "ray" tool, so it continues endlessly in either direction, making the matrix continuous. So, when the day starts, the matrix is already there. This is only a 2-min matrix. This matrix is part of a larger matrix, and the larger the matrix timeframe, the more powerful it becomes. But I think Jack is a lot better at this stuff, anyway... I'm still experimenting with the parameters and market migration. Compliments, ~Scientist
Thanks Jack for your sharing. Luckily Baron has set a ceiling on how many words each post, and you should thank him, not lightly. Otherwise, I guess you would never finish writing , and we reading . Do you have a web site set up for organising all your thoughts so that anytime you can refer us to your site, in order to save your time and ours as well? Just a thought!
This is a lot freakier and more accurate than matrices... My research on Fibonacci Circles... Sorry the circles aren't very visible, the compression killed it. Make sure you turn up the brightness on your monitor... Compliments, ~Scientist
Here's a more visible fib study. Remember: When you're doing them live, you fit the left hemisphere to past price action, and the right hemisphere is the future! Just one of many things I use... Fib Circles rock... ~Scientist
Here's another one... I save them every day, I've got thousands by now! :eek: This example shows that fibonacci even works despite an overnight gap! Oh - the one above actually shows an overnight gap-up, too! ~Scientist