So what you're saying is, releasing secret Intel by the Republicans to smear the FBI is ok, but releasing secret Intel by the Democrats as a counter argument is not ok.
I think the Democrats are not without flaws, but they give consideration to those who need it. They are more inclusive. More so than the Republicans, they aim for a functional society. The problem is that the poor uneducated white don't even know who their enemy is. And make no mistake, the Republicans, in their current configuration, are no friends of minorities either. Or anyone, for that matter, but the privileged. If nothing else, Trump would NEVER have gotten the Democratic nomination. That in itself tells you something about the two parties.
So what you're saying is that you don't understand the difference between an official release of a document that has classified information, and someone leaving the room for a moment to anonymously leak something to the press that hasn't been cleared for release?
And out comes the token comment about everyone having flaws, yadda yadda yadda. Freddie, the reason you have no credibility around here is that you have never been able to look at anything in a balanced light. Like, ever. I've challenged you many times to show me posts of yours that are critical of your party, and we can compare them to posts of mine critical to those on the right. You've never accepted the challenge, and for good reason. You'd get slaughtered. If there is one post in the last year with you openly critical - not just paying lip service - to the democrats, I'd be surprised. The problem is the system. It's rotten to the core. That's the reason Trump got elected - not some ridiculous bullshit about Russian facebook ads. You guys put up a corrupt candidate - and we can argue all day about this proof and that - but you put up a candidate who has thrived in the system for decades. The republicans did the same thing, with a whole host of similar swamp creatures like Rubio and Jeb, etc. People had enough and they wanted to send a message. And folks like you still haven't gotten that message, which is why things will continue to get more and more extreme on both sides of the aisle until the whole system comes crashing down and we're left with something akin to a dictator. And then it'll be all the things you lefties really hate, but with no power to stop any of it. Mark my words.
Like, whoa, dude. Like, really? The Democrats put up a corrupt candidate? When was that? Clearly it was not Hillary, since you firmly and vehemently believe in innocence until guilt is proven. Right? Tell me, do you think the ever-so-innocent Trump will complete his term?
I will kindly refer you to the post you quoted when beginning this dialogue, advising careful attention to the boldface, underlined and enlarged portion of the text.
Do you believe the Democratic Party took any efforts to ensure the election so that Bernie would not win? I'm just curious here on whether you deny that as Russian propaganda as well. Yes, he will. Mostly because the process to get rid of him is so complicated and convoluted and there will be nothing found on the so-called "Russian collusion" nonsense.
There were some unfortunate events to be sure. But how does this implicate Hillary herself? Where is your evidence that she had a hand in any underhandedness? You have already labeled her as corrupt, a label you are incapable of assigning to Trump. Where is the difference? Where is the evidence.
I'm just curious here, so don't get your panties in a bunch. Do you believe these "unfortunate events" (which, had they been on the Republican side would have been labeled by you in much, much stronger terms of course) were done without any knowledge by the Clinton campaign?