I will guarantee you one thing----If you were to debate Mark Levin, it would be like you were fighting and defending yourself with cardboard. You would be wrong on all occasions. The man is a brilliant constitutional scholar.
If he says so himself and is seconded by.. you.. We can make Ann Coulter "absolutely brilliant" and you would not know if she was or not Buy1andStop.
1. money laundering 2. tax evasion 3. obstruction of justice 4. willfully conspiring to violate campaign contribution limits 5. willful self dealing within a charitable foundation to benefit himself 6. violation of the emoluments clause of the U.S. Constitution. Court cases re the latter two crimes are on-going as I write this. Of course these are just the tip of the iceberg.
What a canard! There's no evidence yet presented of any of this! ---and as for number 3, POTUS cannot obstruct justice. POTUS IS justice. Don't be a dunce again and claim falsely to the contrary.
I operate at a much higher intellectual level than you or the other lefties do. Thank you for your kind comments.
I'm gonna have to say you are probably right. He's no boy-scout. But they're all crooked. They really are.