wrbtrader - Please show us the scientific peer reviewed studies and data that demonstrate your statement below (highlighted in blue). Thank you.
Please go read the entire thread dedicated to the subject and educate yourself. Yes, the Unvaccinated are Variant Factories. https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/unvaccinated-people-are-variant-factories.359925/
Says the one who has yet to give a straight up Yes or No to the following. Where is the courage of your convictions? Yes or No Son?
As explained before we are not going to play your stupid anti-vax gotcha games. I provided the facts multiple times from reputable sources - go read them.
Hell, I'm as vaxxed as you son. What's with the childish name-calling? Why post such huge volumes or large font articles off the internet yet avoid specific scientific peer reviewed journal that will prove your position? If you got the goods, then let's see the proof. If you want to provide actionable information, if you actually want to be helpful, cite peer reviewed scientific data to support your claim, not Vague misdirection attempts to "Look over There", Don't be afraid to commit. Cite specific peer reviewed scientific data to support your claim. Then all who believe the science can see the same science that you see, specifically. In Science, the conclusions are based on Specific work. Go for it gwb. easymon1 said: This is a Yes or No question. Is it your claim that jabs are safe and effective against D-Variant and that you have posted peer reviewed scientific data to support your claim, gwb-trader? Yes or No?
Reputable journalistic outlets rely on such studies, so their articles are perfectly adequate for the type of discussions that occur here.
bullshirt. Look at the Source Studies. Secondhand articles are nowhere near the Actual peer reviewed journal that is the substance of careers and can hold the claimant accountable. Media is Not held accountable. If a claimant has based a conclusion on a peer reviewed scientific source study, why would that claimant be shy about committing to the statement "Yes, this is the specific peer reviewed scientific study journal article on which I base my conclusion." Do you hold any patents, ipatent?
ipatent, heres a good example of why you are wrong on articles vs peer reviewed studies. I don't make any judgement as to the veracity of this graphic image below. This is why gwb's source citation is important. Any view can be found in the bullshirt format that gwb spams across the universe. Here's a quickie to demonstrate my point ipatent. Same goes for you gwb. Without reading the cited source for this conclusion it is meaningless. Just some media whore trying to up the circulation of this particular rag. There is no citation of source in the articles that you and gwb rant on about. Just a bunch of noise with no signal. signal being scientific citations that can be traced back to the minutest of details which a study journal article, as well as a patent application require. I Do Not Support This Below displayed Viewpoint . I have seen No Supporting Scientific Study in Support. Just the Same as the Claim Made by gwb.