Austria locked down the unvaccinated on Monday, November 15th with the government stating it would be about a week before the impact is seen. The Covid cases in Austria peaked on November 23rd and then a steep decline in cases started. Unvaccinated plague rats in venues such as restaurants, concerts, etc. cause most of the spread and cases.
I haven't been following this country too much. In fact, even with the fines and threats of arrests in Austria... Many people there seem to be ignoring the Covid restrictions and having a good time ignoring it when indoors with friends too. Maybe that's why they have outbreaks that are threatening their Hospital System ??? wrbtrader
Florida Reaches Lowest Case Rate in the Nation Is it true? Who the hell knows? CDC is not keeping records worth a shirt! There's no scientific analysis much less peer reviewed conclusion presented here... More fluff, just like gwb spam...lol Governor Ron DeSantis Highlights Florida Leading the Nation’s Job Growth MEMO: Executive Order 21-224 (Special Elections – Senate District 33, House District 88, and House District 94) Florida Reaches Lowest Case Rate in the Nation On October 27, 2021, in News Releases, by Staff Tallahassee, Fla. – As a result of Governor Ron DeSantis’ leadership and our data-driven approach free of mandates, the State of Florida has one of the lowest COVID-19 daily average case rates in the last 7 days per 100,000 residents in the United States. “Without mandates or lockdowns, COVID-19 cases in Florida have decreased 90% since August,” said Governor Ron DeSantis. “In addition to cases, hospitalizations have plummeted in our state. This has been accomplished by making monoclonal antibody treatments and vaccines widely available throughout our state while protecting Floridians from government overreach.” About this data Sources: State and local health agencies (cases, deaths); U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (hospitalizations); Centers for Disease Control and state governments (vaccinations); Census Bureau (population and demographic data). The daily average is calculated with data that was reported in the last seven days. Vaccination data is not available for some states. All-time charts show data from Jan. 21, 2020 to present. www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/us/covid-cases.html “As Florida now ranks lowest in the continental US in terms of COVID-19 rates per capita, we are proud to have stood firm in protecting liberty throughout the pandemic,” said Lieutenant Governor Nuñez. “Governor DeSantis’ approach was guided by science, data, and pragmatism, not fear and alarmist narratives.” Since August: COVID cases in school-aged children have decreased 87% since schools started; and, Cases in young adults ages 18 to 24 decreased 93%. “Under the Governor’s leadership, Florida has continued to take innovative approaches to the COVID-19 response – and it is incredible to see the data showing this success,” said State Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo. “Moving forward, we must continue focusing on data and evidence to make public health decisions and not allow such decisions to be politicized.” “Protecting our seniors and Florida’s front line health care workers from the impacts of COVID-19 has been and continues to be a priority for Governor DeSantis,” said Agency for Health Care Administration Secretary Simone Marstiller. “His data-driven, forward-thinking approach to tackling the impacts of COVID-19 are working. He has empowered Florida families to make the best decisions for their circumstances and kept them in their homes and communities and out of our hospitals.” Since launching state-run monoclonal antibody sites in August: More than 147,000 Floridians have received treatments at our 25 locations; and Hospitalizations have decreased 87%. Over 73% of eligible populations have been vaccinated in our state, which is on par with national averages. Florida focused on Seniors First, and as a result, individuals 65 and older have a very high vaccination rate of nearly 90%. Since June, among individuals: 12-19 years old, vaccination rates have increased by 27% 20-29 years old, vaccination rates have increased by 18% 30-39 years old, vaccination rates have increased by 20% 40-49 years old, vaccination rates have increased by 19% 50-59 years old, vaccination rates have increased by 15% 60-64 years old, vaccination rates have increased by 11% Floridians can find all COVID-19 resources, including monoclonal antibody treatment and vaccine locations at www.floridahealthcovid19.gov.
Chinese soccer players, African soccer players dropping at same rate as the rest of world? (Two less US Product vaxxed countries) Who the hell knows? Where's the science? For a serious pandemic, there's a serious lack of transparent scientific study published, no?
Is it true? Where's the Science? Who the hell knows. Lack of Citation of supporting Science is Obvious throughout the "Press".
Let's take a scientific look at the anti-vax nonsense you are pushing so people understand the proper context. In the wrong hands, vaccination statistics can prove deadly. Simpson's Paradox shows why https://medicalxpress.com/news/2021-11-wrong-vaccination-statistics-deadly-simpson.html There has been much discussion of late about data published on 1 November, 2021, by the Office for National Statistics (ONS). It is titled "Deaths involving COVID-19 by vaccination status, England: deaths occurring between 2 January and 24 September 2021." The raw statistics show death rates in England for people aged 10 to 59, listing vaccination status separately. Counterintuitively, these statistics show that the death rates for the vaccinated in this age grouping were greater than for the unvaccinated. These numbers have since been heavily promoted and highlighted on social media by anti-vaccine advocates, who use them to argue that vaccination increases the risk of death. The claim is strange, though, because we know from efficacy and effectiveness studies that COVID-19 vaccines offer strong protection against severe disease. For example, the efficiency and effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine has been shown to be well over 90% in this regard in the most recent studies. Vaccine efficacy of 90% means that you have a 90% reduced risk compared to an otherwise similar unvaccinated person, based on controlled randomized trials, while vaccine effectiveness refers to real-world outcomes. On either measure, vaccines work very well indeed. So what's going on here? Well, closer inspection of the ONS report reveals that over the period of the study, from January to September 2021, the age-adjusted risk of death involving COVID-19 was 32 times greater among unvaccinated people compared to fully vaccinated people. But hold on! How can we square this with the data from the table listing death rates of those aged 10 to 59 by vaccination status? For the answer we turn to a classic statistical artifact known as Simpson's Paradox, which seems to pop up and create misleading conclusions all over the place. It is a consequence of the way that data is presented. Essentially, Simpson's Paradox can arise when observing a feature of a broad, widely drawn group, where there is an uneven distribution of the population within this group, for example by age or vaccination status. Ignorance of the implications of Simpson's Paradox can generate misleading conclusions, which can be, and in this case are, very dangerous. The paradox in these particular ONS statistics arises specifically because death rates increase dramatically with age, so that at the very top end of this age band, for example, mortality rates are about 80 times as high as at the very bottom end. A similar pattern is observed between vaccination rates and age. For example, in the 10 to 59 data set more than half of those vaccinated are over the age of 40. Those who are in the upper ranges of the wide 10 to 59 age band are, therefore, both more likely to have been vaccinated and also more likely to die if infected with COVID-19 or for any other reason, and vice versa. Age is acting, in the terminology of statistics, as a confounding variable, being positively related to both vaccination rates and death rates. Put another way, you are more likely to die in a given period if you are older and you are also more likely to be vaccinated if you are older. It is age that is driving up death rates not the vaccinations. Without the vaccinations, deaths would be hugely greater from COVID-19. So what if we divide the 10 to 59 group into smaller age groups? If we break down the band into narrower age ranges, such as 10 to 19, 20 to 29, 30 to 39, 40 to 49, and 50 to 59, we find that the counter-intuitive headline finding immediately disappears. In each age band, the death rates of the vaccinated are vastly lower than those of the unvaccinated. This also applies in the higher age bands—60 to 69, 70 to 79, and 80 plus. Basically, unvaccinated people are much younger on average, and therefore less likely to die. Yet there are those out there who are more than happy to use these statistics to mislead. The consequence is that many who would otherwise choose to be vaccinated might refuse to do so. In truth, the age-adjusted risk of deaths involving coronavirus (COVID-19) over the first nine months of this year was in fact 32 times greater in the unvaccinated than the fully vaccinated. This is a hugely important statistic, and we must not let statistical manipulation be used to obscure this critical information. The lives of countless people really do depend on us exposing this truth.
Hell, I'm as vaxxed as you son. What's with the childish name-calling? Why post such huge volumes or large font articles off the internet yet avoid specific scientific peer reviewed journal that will prove your position? If you got the goods, then let's see the proof. If you want to provide actionable information, if you actually want to be helpful, cite peer reviewed scientific data to support your claim, not Vague misdirection attempts to "Look over There", Don't be afraid to commit. Cite specific peer reviewed scientific data to support your claim. Then all who believe the science can see the same science that you see, specifically. In Science, the conclusions are based on Specific work. Go for it gwb. easymon1 said: This is a Yes or No question. Is it your claim that jabs are safe and effective against D-Variant and that you have posted peer reviewed scientific data to support your claim, gwb-trader? Yes or No?
gwb, This is a Yes or No question. Is it your claim that jabs are safe and effective against D-Variant and that you have posted peer reviewed scientific data to support your claim, gwb-trader? Yes or No?