McCain Admits Bush Administration Violated International Law

Discussion in 'Politics' started by OPTIONAL777, Aug 31, 2009.




  1. RPFLMAO!!!! And Bill Clinton only had 8 years of these types of briefings. They must have held these briefings while he was getting his dick sucked, because he obviously wasn't listening, and did nothing. lol :p
     
    #21     Sep 1, 2009
  2. And during those 8 years nothing close to a 9-11 event ever happened

    I could care less what Bill is doing in his private life when he is creating 24 million jobs,one of the best economies ever,balancing the budget,lowering the national debt.Maybe more Presidents need to get more blow jobs so they can have the same success that bill had
     
    #22     Sep 1, 2009
  3. How many Americans died as a result of terrorist activity during Clinton vs. Bush?

    (Don't forget to count all the American soldiers, journalists, etc. needlessly killed in Iraq in a war based on bogus intel...)

     
    #23     Sep 1, 2009
  4. Bush supporters probably blame that on Clinton too
     
    #24     Sep 1, 2009
  5. Undoubtedly...

    Bush 1 knew enough to stay from Pandora's box, his stupid offspring didn't...

     
    #25     Sep 1, 2009
  6. jem

    jem

    more like you were asked and you evaded.
     
    #26     Sep 1, 2009
  7. Agreed
     
    #27     Sep 1, 2009
  8. You evade and ignore legal rulings and legal opinions by judges you don't agree with...

    KKKlassic...

     
    #28     Sep 1, 2009


  9. By the time the 9/11 attacks occurred, the plan was already in place to be executed. It was the Clinton administration that failed the country in stopping this. But how could he worry about something so meaningless to him like securing the country, when he was "getting impeached', "getting sued", "lying under oath during depositions", "obstructing justice", and "cheating on his wife". The blood from the 9/11 victims is on Bill Clinton's hands.
     
    #29     Sep 1, 2009
  10. Honetly, looking back and trying to blame one president or the other for 9/11 is pointless. Clearly Clinton was too mushy in his response to bin Ladin, but he could plausibly say he had no way of anticipating what would happen. Similarly, Bush might have been more proactive, if only in jettisoning clinton-era policies that restricted intell sharing.

    The real fact is that simple procedures could have prevented 9/11. Mandating impregnable cockpit doors for one. Arming air crews. Profiling likely terrorists, eg young arab men. Requiring a valid visa to board a domestic flight. Simple steps that would have prevented 9/11.

    They were not taken because of a combination of airline resistance, political correctness and bureaucratic ineptitude. Both parties have to share blame.

    Finger pointing, trying to politicize these issues and moral posturing distract us from the important task of keeping the country safe.
     
    #30     Sep 2, 2009