McBush claims in the 21st century "Nations don't invade other nations"

Discussion in 'Politics' started by ZZZzzzzzzz, Aug 14, 2008.

  1. unless they're the wrong religion
  2. I really can't blame McBush for continually making mistakes like this, after all he is over 500 years old (in dog years)...

    :p :p :p
  3. kut2k2


    This guy is so far into the senile zone, it's all he can do to keep from drooling on himself. Possibly a worse president than W if he makes it.
  4. Ah,
    but you guys are forgetting that the ossetian separatists sent rockets after McCain's helicopter when he was visiting Georgia in 2006. There is absolutely no love lost there, and McCain loses no sleep over seeing those ethnic minorities go ...
  5. Seeing how forceful some geopolitical strategies are - we now have the perfect rationale for "the marginal win" by John McCain as the next president of the USA.
  6. Does Obama oppose sending American troops into foreign nations? Does Obama oppose bombing Muslims? I didn't think so....

    "Obama said if elected in November 2008 he would be willing to attack inside Pakistan with or without approval from the Pakistani government, a move that would likely cause anxiety in the already troubled region.

    "If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won't act, we will," Obama said."
  7. Going after a terrorist cell within a country and invading the entire country to effect regime change of that country are not the same.

  8. Yea right.

    And when the less than American friendly post-Musharuff government say's "get the fuck out of our country" then what?
  9. Then a reasonable man is not stubborn and reassess the situation.

    Of course, Bush and McBush are unreasonable men with their "stay the course" mentality...Obama has shown the ability to adapt to changing situations.

    #10     Aug 14, 2008