Yeah, I also have a 80%+ win rate when backtesting ... people will never learn what bullshit can be conjured via computer models ... prediction... Mathematician dude adjusts his models after Obama gets his ass handed to him so he can maintain his perfect record... BOOK IT
Actually, given the likelihood that the Republicans will be dumb enough to nominate another neocon, I think it is entirely likely that Obama will get a second term. Plus demographics works in his favor. The fastest growing part of the population, Hispanics, votes 70% for the illegal immigration party.
yeah, that is why it is rational to deinvest in this country ... our fate lies in the third-world with a rich history of failure and statism .... But these are the rantings of a "racist" ... a "fill the moat with crocidiles" type of American... for the love of God... VOTE OBAMA THE HELL OUT
Funny you would label the democratic party the party of illegal immigration when Reagan granted amnesty for illegals and Bush and Mccain tried to
yeah, you have a point ... the fact is, I like most Conservatives have a real soft-spot for Hispanics, they for the most part, are honorable people ... the road to hell is paved ... Hispanic Illegal immigrants are a HUGE drain on state budgets ...
Invariably the Republican President turns out to be a turncoat on that issue. The mass media always gets behind the open borders candidate, as they did with McCain in 2008 and are doing with Perry now. Usually we get the President the media selects for us. BTW, Ronald Reagan later said that that amnesty was the biggest mistake he ever made. (He was right, California will never vote Republican again in a state wide election.) The Democrats at least know which side their bread is buttered on, and it's not the side with the white people on it. Nearly all opposition to illegal immigration comes from Republicans, and nearly all Democratic politicians favor the Dream Act, "comprehensive immigration reform" (illegal alien amnesty) and tax payer funded benefits for illegals.
Nope, that was 2004, but you do have a point. Bush shouldn't have been the predicted winner in either election. Maybe his model is so accurate, that he can predict cheats too...