Masters of Fake News Conservatives Push 2015 bribery case as evidence of Uranium One corruption

Discussion in 'Politics' started by exGOPer, Jan 14, 2018.

  1. jem

    jem

    how do you know what deals guestra struck?

    when you purchase a company you may make the deal contingent on key man clauses, or key player responsibilities which extend into the future. its very common.

    such as using contacts to get future deals closed

    bribing politicians might not be a written key term but when putin's team buys you out for millions your choice might be contribute to the clinton fund on demand or worry about polonium deserts for the next 20 years.

    you think all these former goldman guys love contributing to politicians or do you think they understand part of their over compensation is that the FED reserve expects over paid wall street types to use their money for influence?

    you like to pretend the clintons are involved in a world of clean deals.
    shady deals are shady.

     
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2018
    #21     Jan 17, 2018
  2. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    LOL, so I have to prove a negative now?

    Where is your proof that such clauses exist? Also you keep forgetting that U1 is a Canadian company, if Putin wanted to buy it, US couldn't stop him, at best they would have had to divest from US operations which as I said are completely irrelevant to controlling the market.

    And you keep talking about CF as if it's their personal piggy bank, IRS won't let them use their money even if they were starving - so they take all that money for whose benefit exactly?
     
    #22     Jan 17, 2018
  3. jem

    jem

    you keep bringing up the bullshit excuses. I am explaining why your excuses are bullshit.
    I am not making any excuses. Clinton got paid millions, uranium illegally left the country and made its way to Europe, it appears the fbi and Obama's team did not share their investigation info with decision makers on the hill.

    why do you keep telling me it was a canadian company? that is irrelevant to the point here.


    how many different articles have to tell you what the issue is... before you get it through your dnc paid head?


    "Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said at the time that it was "disturbing" to see that some of the yellowcake uranium had made its way overseas despite promises from the U.S. government to the contrary.

    The more that surfaces about this deal, the more questions it raises," Grassley said in a statement.

    "It now appears that despite pledges to the contrary, U.S. uranium made its way overseas as a part of the Uranium One deal," Grassley said in the statement. "What’s more disturbing, those transactions were apparently made possible by various Obama Administration agencies while the Democrat-controlled Congress turned a blind eye."

    http://thehill.com/policy/internati...maryland-executive-in-uranium-one-deal-report"

     
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2018
    #23     Jan 17, 2018
  4. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    1. Clinton didn't get paid shit, nothing went to her personal account. That's your lie number 1

    2. One shipment of a company that produces 0.0003% of world uranium - so a shipment of basically 0.0000003% went to Europe - this is what Putin spent millions on? This is what he bribed for? Why does Putin care for Europe now? Europe can't buy Uranium in the open market?

    You got to be kidding me with this bullshit.

    3. Fuck Grassley, he is a lying snake, whatever the uranium went was under orders of NRSC, not like U1 decided to break the law otherwise PROSECUTE them and let me know. Enough with the insinuation bullshit.
     
    #24     Jan 17, 2018
  5. jem

    jem

    1. the clinton foundation got paid millions. you have no idea how much she benefited from that.

    2. your math makes no sense with respect to this set of facts. the amount of uranium that went to Europe is independent of the companys market share.
    it was reported that the NRC did not disclose how much uranium went to europe and asia only that it was 25 percent of the shipment up to Canada. So it appears that you are lying your ass off again.

    The hill did report... The license, reviewed by The Hill, is dated March 16, 2012, and it increased the amount of uranium ore concentrate that RSB Logistics could ship to the Cameco Corp. plant in Ontario from 7,500,000 kilograms to 12,000,000 kilograms and added Uranium One to the “other parties to Export.”

    http://thehill.com/policy/national-...deal-led-to-some-exports-to-europe-memos-show

    So 25% of that increase would be about 1,125,000 kilograms.

    3. Grassley, Senator Barasso and others have stated it was under Putin's control. you have provided no reason to doubt them. So excuse us if we don't take the opinion of a dnc troll seriously.

    4. Whether the uranium left the country under orders or not is irrelevant. The clintons got millions. Putin got control of Uranium one. uranium left the country illegally. the Fbi and the administration did not properly inform decision makers...

    I wonder, if we look into this...we will see its related.... to this...

    5. and Iran got billions in Euros and other currencies in cash from Obama on pallets and Obama apparently approved secret side deals to allow Iran to buy Uranium from Kazakhstan.
    https://www.commentarymagazine.com/...an/iran-yellowcake-nuclear-deal-ernest-moniz/


     
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2018
    #25     Jan 17, 2018
  6. exGOPer

    exGOPer


    1. Exactly Clinton Foundation got money - that automatically doesn't mean Clintons got money - they are an IRS audited charity whose every penny is monitored, if Clinton's used it to personally enrich themselves then feel free to post evidence of that instead of saying they got the millions themselves.

    2. The amount of Uranium that went to EUROPE (NOT RUSSIA) was miniscule, it would be a small percentage of the 0.003% that U1 produces. It makes no sense that Putin bribed millions for this amount of Uranium to go to Europe (not even his own country)

    3. Show me where it says that Uranium exported was under PUtin's control.

    4. Lie no.1 AGAIN - Clintons didn't get any money personally
    U1 is a CANADIAN company, he would have got control of it regardless of Hillary or Obama's objections
    Lie no.3 that Uranium left the country illegally - if it left illegally then where are the damn prosecutions? Where is even the investigation by the FBI or DOJ?

    YOu keep wondering because what you post is complete conjecture

    5. So Obama is in on it? What? And Obama has to allow Iran to do it's own shopping?

    I am done with you idiots, just conspiracy over conspiracies over conspiracies. Everyone is corrupt except their own guy who has actually settled cases for fraud and who stole money from charities.


    LET ME KNOW WHEN THERE ARE INDICTMENTS, I DONT WANT TO HEAR ONE MORE WORD OF YOUR FANTASY NOVEL

    Save me your bullshit till then, just lies after lies based on insinuations and fake news. I objectively proved that your story about U1 'indictment' is a fraud but you won't breathe a word about it, you spin yarns about some other crap but never mention how your side got this story completely wrong. Why would anyone believe any more of your crap if you can't get basic details right?
     
    #26     Jan 17, 2018
  7. jem

    jem

    1. The Clinton Foundation routinely misreported, misfiled and hid foreign donations.
    (evidence of guilt )

    2. I already showed you, you are lying about the amount of uranium which went to Europe. It was at least 25% of the U1 shipments to Canada that did not return. So it looks like over a million kilotons based on the shipment license. But, we were told the amount has not been revealed by the NRC. How the hell are you coming up with your fake number.

    3. I have already done so but here it is again.



    4. the Clinton Foundation got millions. Bill got paid double his fee for a speech. I think it was half a million. You lie not me, troll. The U1 uranium was not supposed to leave the country without Congress receiving notice. It left via via subterfuge. 25% of it did not get returned and it should have.

    5. Its possible Obama was in on it. That is why it needs to be investigation fully.

    for any lefty who can't handle the truth here is a lefty source.
    the New York Times

    https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?
     
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2018
    #27     Jan 18, 2018
  8. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    I love how grand conspiracies like this rely on the people being such competent masterminds they can pull off deals like this without any investigators being able to make a case against them but incompetent enough that every bud light drinking nascar dad in the country has them dead to rights.

    Let me know when there are indictments, I have no interest in Breitbart author hitpieces in NYT without a shred of evidence and who are supposedly fake news when it comes to Trump but gospel when it comes to anything on Clinton.

    And does Barasso realize that U1 is a Canadian company? Nothing the US could do other than forcing divestment of a company that produces 5% of US's 3% Uranium production. How dumb one has to be to consider that a factor.
     
    #28     Jan 18, 2018
  9. jem

    jem

    I see you realized you were bullshitting about everything from the amount exported to whether the Clintons got paid to whether Putin and his companies were in control. Now you are relying on the fact Mueller or Comey or McCabe whose wife got 750,000 from Clinton bag man McAullife did not investigate the Obama administration.

    run along dnc troll.

    If I recall you argued in the past that no uranium even left the country.


     
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2018
    #29     Jan 18, 2018
  10. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    You are the one bullshitting.

    Claiming Putin bribed Clintons so one shipment of a tiny percentage can go to EUROPE of all places and that too UNDER NRSC authority.

    And AGAIN and AGAIN I ASK - what's stopping TRUMP DOJ from investigating Hillary and bringing charges if necessary. Why are you Cons still acting like you have no power. A REPUBLICAN is FBI director as well, why are you still talking about Comey and Mcable It's been a year and all you got is ANNOUNCEMENTS that something may happen in the future, some great unraveling that never comes. Sick and tired of this bullshit.

    This is what you cons do, just push around same crap over and over again, insinuating and if somebody dares asks for RESULTS then they are trolls.

    And lastly - WHY AREN'T you calling out the fake news that this indictment has NOTHING to do with U1? And you dare call me a troll?
     
    #30     Jan 18, 2018