Massachusetts wants to pull the plug on Robinhood

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by ajacobson, Apr 15, 2021.

  1. ajacobson

    ajacobson

  2. ajacobson

    ajacobson

    AdChoices
    [​IMG]
    Massachusetts wants to pull the plug on Robinhood
    By Matt Egan, CNN Business 2 hrs ago





    upload_2021-4-15_18-41-56.png
    Regulators in Massachusetts are seeking to pull the plug on Robinhood just as the booming app aims to go public in a blockbuster IPO.

    [​IMG]© Tiffany Hagler-Geard/Bloomberg/Getty Images The Robinhood application on a smartphone arranged in Hastings-On-Hudson, New York, U.S., on Friday, Jan. 29, 2021. GameStop Corp. advanced on Friday and was on track to recoup much of Thursdays $11 billion blow after Robinhood Markets Inc. and other brokerages eased trading restrictions on the video-game retailer.
    The Massachusetts Securities Division escalated its months-long battle against the controversial startup Thursday by moving to revoke its broker-dealer license in the state.

    To make their case, state regulators accused Robinhood of failing to properly account for fractional shares traded by customers on its platform and said the company "continues to entice and induce inexperienced customers into risky trading."

    The push by Massachusetts to revoke Robinhood's license is yet another obstacle facing the company as it prepares to go public after filing confidentially for an IPO late last month. The big question is whether Robinhood's legal and PR troubles will matter to investors compared with the startup's breathtaking growth.



    Robinhood slams regulator as 'elitist'
    In a blog post, Robinhood sharply criticized what it described as "unfounded, politicized allegations and unreasonable demands" from regulators in Massachusetts and warned that revoking its license would block access for millions of customers.

    "The Massachusetts Securities Division's attempt to prevent Massachusetts residents from choosing how they invest is elitist and against everything we stand for," Robinhood said. "We don't believe our customers are naive as the Massachusetts Securities Division paints them to be."

    Robinhood fired back by filing a complaint and motion in Massachusetts State Court for a preliminary injunction that would stop the regulatory case against the company. Robinhood is arguing that the regulator's new fiduciary rule "exceeds its authority" under both state and federal law.

    "By trying to block Robinhood, the division is attempting to bring its residents back in time and reinstate the financial barriers that Robinhood was founded to break down," Robinhood said in the blog post.



    More than just confetti
    The battle began in December when regulators in Massachusetts filed a 24-page complaint against Robinhood accusing the company of violating state law and regulations by failing to protect customers and safeguard its system. Officials alleged Robinhood lured inexperienced investors to its platform with gaming elements such as colorful confetti -- a practice that the company recently said it is getting rid of.

    The amended complaint filed Thursday says Robinhood has continued a pattern of aggressively enticing customers, including some with "little or no investment experience." It cites news reports indicating Robinhood has expanded margin lending and sought to persuade customers to deposit their stimulus checks by offering "free cash" for deposits.



    Robinhood's conduct since the complaint was filed in December "poses a substantial and continued risk to Massachusetts investors," the complaint said.

    Massachusetts regulators said Robinhood has failed to report its fractional share trade executions for over a year, "demonstrating its inability to follow the most basic requirements" required of broker-dealers.



    Booming growth
    The fight with Massachusetts adds to a long list of problems Robinhood has been dealing with in recent months.

    CEO Vlad Tenev was hauled before Congress earlier this year amid scrutiny over Robinhood's trading restrictions during the GameStop turmoil. Robinhood was also fined $65 million by the SEC for allegedly deceiving customers.

    The company was sued by the parents of a 20-year-old trader who killed himself after he saw a negative balance of $730,000 in his trading account and mistakenly believed that was the sum he owed.

    And yet, despite this turbulent stretch for Robinhood, the company continues to grow rapidly -- especially in the crypto space.

    During the first quarter alone, 9.5 million customers traded cryptocurrencies on Robinhood, according to the company. That's up from just 1.7 million during the final three months of last year.
     
    murray t turtle and Nobert like this.
  3. there were several cases where Robinhood's customers accounts were hacked. I wonder what happened to those people. Did they ever get their accounts reimbursed?
    yes, they can make all the rules they want. probably, it'd be hard to implement or execute them. almost everything is conducted online. MA can't prevent every PC, laptop, cell phone in MA from accessing the Robinhood servers.
     
    murray t turtle and Nobert like this.
  4. JSOP

    JSOP

    Fractional shares is a problem but "entice and induce inexperienced customers into risky trading" is unfair. Enticing and inducing inexperienced customers into risky trading is what all brokerages do. And besides you have to define "risky". Investment trading is risky in itself even including mutual funds because positive return is never guaranteed. People have lost ten's of thousands in mutual funds. So are you going to ban people from investing in mutual funds? Term deposits is the only riskless investment so people can put their money in term deposits from now on?
     
    murray t turtle and Snuskpelle like this.
  5. Snuskpelle

    Snuskpelle

    Agreed, populists like throwing the word risky about without any sense of proportions. An index fund is pretty risky at times. It has to be.
     
  6. SunTrader

    SunTrader

    :confused:
    Of course, that is why they will just look to Robinhood legally to enforce their rule.

    Same as PDT, being a legal tax-ID'd U.S. resident etc., etc.
     
    ET180 and murray t turtle like this.
  7. ET180

    ET180

    Follow the money...what lobbyist is trying to kill RobinHood?
     
    murray t turtle likes this.
  8. SunTrader

    SunTrader

    Right why pick on RH when all kinds of Consumer Goods companies use bait and switch as a normal everyday practice? No one is saying to grandma don't buy that bottle of Ketchup labeled - same price but 30% more "Free". o_O
     
    murray t turtle likes this.
  9. %%
    Huge number of mutual fund elephants, in MA but dont know if that has anything to do with it. Bankers have a big lobby, i have no idea if they consider RH competition??