Martins Beach: Eminent domain hearing today

Discussion in 'Chit Chat' started by dealmaker, Dec 6, 2016.

  1. Arnie

    Arnie

    Wow, really complicated. He owns all of the beach except the tidal portion. The fact that for 70 years previous owner granted access really gums it up. This looks like a prescriptive easement and in the end I think the courts will make him grant access.

    https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/NEL...4&fileDownloadName=0405AB380_ande_handout.pdf

    We had a big stink here in VA with landowners claiming they owned a river. They claimed a "Crown Grant" and courts sided with them. When you float that section you can't fish it (they "own" the fish) and you can't wade as they "own" the river bottom.
     
    #21     Oct 5, 2017
  2. RRY16

    RRY16

    He should have just left it open from day 1, use to party there in high school,now with all the publicity people know about it, it use to be somewhat secluded and a local hangout. The problem with the area and beach is it's cold and windy most of the year not like Southern California.
     
    #22     Oct 5, 2017
  3. vanzandt

    vanzandt

    Easy for you to say... you don't own the f'n property.
    I'd build a wall. A big beautiful Trumpian wall. Keep all the high school dopes out.
     
    #23     Oct 5, 2017
  4. RRY16

    RRY16

    I think there's a double wide on the property you can lease.
     
    #24     Oct 5, 2017
  5. vanzandt

    vanzandt

    Good.
    "Be it ever so humble".....
     
    #25     Oct 5, 2017
  6. Baron

    Baron ET Founder

    My prediction is that Khosla is going to get hammered yet again if he takes this to the Supreme Court, and the whole damn thing is going to end up being one big waste of time and money for him. His ego got the best of him on this one, and like the famous NY Times bestselling book is titled:



    :D:D
     
    #26     Oct 5, 2017
    dealmaker likes this.
  7. dealmaker

    dealmaker

    #27     Oct 26, 2017
  8. Cuddles

    Cuddles


    I don't know about that, it's bad precedent to allow the state to dictate how private property should be treated.

    I feel the city should've put an easement on the land if they felt so strongly about public access. What's the point of buying property if you can't use it as you will?
     
    #28     Oct 29, 2017
    Arnie likes this.
  9. dealmaker

    dealmaker

    #29     Nov 29, 2017
  10. RRY16

    RRY16

    #30     Feb 23, 2018