Anyone else think this is a bad deal? Wrigley has about 5.2 billion in assets (less than 1 billion in Net assets) and gross revenue of 5.3 billion. If you have 23 billion to spend, why not just spend 5 billion to create products to rival wrigleys and another 5 billion in the worlds biggest marketing campaign to sell your new products and save that 13 billion? Or at least use another 5 billion to buy wrigleys when its stock plummets 75% from less sales because of the new competition and there you go. You just saved 8 billion dollars. Just a random thought.