marriage and government

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Gordon Gekko, Jan 1, 2004.

  1. ok, i'll take a stab at this,

    well hmmm, i don't have sex with any of the above but i would imagine those who do would use either the missionary position or "doggie" style :p
     
    #301     Jan 4, 2004
  2. Dodge.

     
    #302     Jan 4, 2004
  3. what dodge i just gave you my position.. I DONT DO IT!
     
    #303     Jan 4, 2004
  4. Dodge. A position on a issue doesn't require doing it or not doing it personally.

    You either support a position, or you don't.

    Main Entry: 1po·si·tion
    Pronunciation: p&-'zi-sh&n
    Function: noun

    2 : a point of view adopted and held to . Example: I made my position on the issue clear.


    You have taken a position on sex and marriage that is considered to be immoral by Judeo Christian thought.

    You have defined sex and your sexual gratification as nothing more than stimulation of pleasure centers having no moral aspect to it.

    Why do you dodge the issue of your position on bestiality, incest, zoophilia, and having sex with children under age who are willing participants? These taboos are condemned by Judeo Christian thought and are against the laws of all major religions and most civilized societies on a moral basis.

    Why won't you tell us your position on these sexual situations?

    You either think bestiality, incest, zoophilia, and having children under age who are willing participants is right and there is nothing wrong with people who engage in such acts, or you think it is wrong.

     
    #304     Jan 4, 2004
  5. ok, your trying to lead me down a road that i don't want to go. i know where your heading... but my Q is much much more to the point..

    so please answer mine now. thank you.
     
    #305     Jan 4, 2004
  6. You are refusing to answer a simple question that should be easy for someone who has no moral authority beyond their own reasoning ability.

    Tell us why you are not willing to answer this question?

     
    #306     Jan 4, 2004
  7. "Even if the physicist needs to postulate an irreducible minimum that had to be present in the beginning, in order for the universe to get started, that irreducible minimum is certainly extremely simple. By definition, explanations that build on simple premises are more plausible and more satisfying than explanations that have to postulate complex and statistically improbable beginnings. And you can't get much more complex than an Almighty God!"


    yes, Richard, you are SO RIGHT.

    :-/
     
    #307     Jan 4, 2004
  8. Dodging my questions.

    Why is that?

     
    #308     Jan 4, 2004
  9. EZ 6:12-13 The Lord says: "... they will fall by the sword, famine and plague. He that is far away will die of the plague, and he that is near will fall by the sword, and he that survives and is spared will die of famine. So will I spend my wrath upon them. And they will know I am the Lord, when the people lie slain among their idols around their altars, on every high hill and on all the mountaintops, under every spreading tree and every leafy oak ...."




    bad, so very bad...

    :-/
     
    #309     Jan 4, 2004
  10. Dodge. Emotionalism in play.

     
    #310     Jan 4, 2004