Marketsurfer's bold gold proclamation

Discussion in 'Commodity Futures' started by marketsurfer, Apr 1, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. If gold went to $975 smurf would claim victory using his Rodney King alias.

    After the C2 lying fiasco, including censoring and deleting long time member posts while defending smurf, it would be wise of ET to ban him for good. His stupidity is off the charts and adds nothing to this site.

    Maybe smurf will start a new message board.. elite-analyst.com
     
    #861     Sep 23, 2009
  2. EPrado

    EPrado

    I never got the alias thing.....It seems he has a few of em.


    We really have to get Surf to handicap this years BC cards.....will give us a bunch of horses to toss out.
     
    #862     Sep 23, 2009
  3. He used rodney king to defend himself when he was being battered on this thread. Rodney said that smurf had a gold stop @ $1000, and was to be commended for putting a stop in on this "trade" !

    I wish he tried horses. BTW--I will have 10/3 free to play that cool Belmont card. Let's see if we can get lightning to strike twice! This time, I will play both sides of the exacta evenly.
     
    #863     Sep 23, 2009
  4. Maybe I should feel honored to be confused with a longtime contributer like Surf.. but.. you don't need to be Frederick Mosteller to do the Bayesian analysis to distinguish between my text and Surf's. And of course, if I were a Surf-alias, I'd have been banned by the mods along with Surf. Unless you're not too brite, this should be obvious.

    Having said that - I do indeed like Surf, and enjoy our lunchtime get-togethers in the city now and again. And, unlike many on E'trader, he uses his real name, refrains from juvenalia such as spewing four-letter words, and is a gracious and generous-spirited host in person.
     
    #864     Sep 23, 2009
  5. Sorry smurf. After you blatantly lied about not using C2 in 2007, you have zero credibility.

    I do like the "Rodney King" handle. Quite appropriate as both of you were beaten to a pulp.
     
    #865     Sep 23, 2009
  6. Pekelo

    Pekelo

    Oh, the irony, Mr. King. That is not your real name is it? :)

    Who the fuck cares about real names anyway? As long as you post intelligent, interesting material with integrity, and know how to make a logical argument, we are perfectly happy calling him Smurf. I don't even care if his trades are paper, as long as they are winners...

    But what is the point of posting losing trades???

    P.S.: Rodney isn't Smurf, he knows too much about technology. :)
    P.S.S.: Pekelo IS my real name.... :cool:
     
    #866     Sep 23, 2009
  7. It's now a sociologic rather than scientific question. For the reasons I adduced before, it's obvious I'm not Surf. Those who insist otherwise must have a <i>need</i> to believe as such. 'If we say it enough times, it will become true.' Nothing I can say or do to address that mindset.
     
    #867     Sep 23, 2009
  8. I had a look at a few of your early posts and I may be mistaken about your being surf. Generally speaking, your spelling errors are different and your vocabulary and sentence structure, not to mention your familiarity with options and apparent breadth of knowledge, suggests that you and surf are not the same person. Even so, your vacuous defense of surf suggests something other than arm's length objectivity. Unholy alliance comes to mind. Do you sometimes let surf use your user name to flatter himself? You also defend VN. Hmm...how do you feel about trend following? That may provide a clue.
     
    #868     Sep 23, 2009
  9. Mr Thunderdog passes the IQ test.. next candidate?
     
    #869     Sep 23, 2009
  10.  
    #870     Sep 23, 2009
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.