Marketsurfer says short shake shack

Discussion in 'Stocks' started by marketsurfer, Apr 25, 2015.

  1. This dawg is going to sub 50 on this plunge over time. Next sub 25. Mark my words. surf
     
    #391     Jun 1, 2015
  2. Buy1Sell2

    Buy1Sell2

    Surely you are aware that there is no system being delivered here on ET by the OP. I can tell you this much though---Price drivers are RSI and MACD divergences that are being read incorrectly. The OP uses charts--make no mistake. He also believes in Technical Analysis and certainly feels that Money Management is the key to trading. ---You are being WOUND UP--plain and simple.
     
    #392     Jun 1, 2015
  3. londonkid

    londonkid

    I agree its going sub 50 long term but your timing is off. New highs will be made to drive out the weak hands first. Will you puke at $100?
     
    #393     Jun 1, 2015
    i960 likes this.
  4. romik

    romik

    Yet the final -24% could equal to -1% risk to total capital.
     
    #394     Jun 1, 2015
    TooOldForThis likes this.
  5. londonkid

    londonkid

    Hold on. I am fine having a sensible debate but not if you are going to be delusional. You cant take a large loss averaging in 4 times then claim others are broken souls for calling you out when you go slightly onside after re-entering.

    If you are claiming 'victory' after being net down large this just got very weird.

    PS retail is 69% short spoos.
     
    #395     Jun 1, 2015
  6. i960

    i960

    The game is always about which side can get screwed the most. Only in pure panic selling or buying do we actually see unmolested moves without prior positioning.
     
    #396     Jun 1, 2015
  7. romik

    romik

    What is he actually selling within his subscription? Forecasts? Forecasts and trade entry calls? Any track record? I will be offering a subscription service in late Summer, I will be providing stats for potential subscribers, Surf refers to his Surf report journal, is that a joke?
     
    #397     Jun 1, 2015
  8. That's possible.
    But what kind of a system is it if you have losses of 24% (from 17 to 36%!!!) ????? That's a system that has no clue.

    On top of that adding three times to a losing position that on top of that is against the direction of the market.... from this kind of systems you can find 13 in a dozen.
     
    #398     Jun 1, 2015
  9. To judge stops you should know the drawdown over the last X years. And also the recovery time after a DD. If there are never 3 stops in a row, the max DD is 25%. Depending of the returns that can be reasonable. The past 10 years I never had a drawdown of 30%, which is for me acceptable. And drawdowns were always recovered within 48 hours.
     
    #399     Jun 1, 2015
  10. romik

    romik

    In principle I don't have anything against large stops, as long as that loss doesn't chew a huge chunk of capital. Scaling in is nonsense though, I agree.
     
    #400     Jun 1, 2015