When one makes a lot of calls, they are bound to get some wrong but it seems disingenuous to start threads like this when they know they've also been way off on other calls.
It's what we call in the industry, "cherry picking." Trying to extrapolate, and justify his "value" by looking at past data points-- which by itself is contradictory by OP's standards. But surfer will never admit to his own double standards. He will change his vocabulary, etc, and infer that it's not equivalent. Pretty retarded way of thinking IMO; And no actual statistical data of his trades to back up anything. Just some chart from 6+ years ago to derive his "value", or lackthereof, and ability to "call turning points." But he calls you full of shit if you draw a trendline on a 5-min chart on the current day data. Walking talking oxymoron. Minus the oxy.
" we call in the industry". LMFAO!!!! And just what industry are you referring to?? and who are "we"? Keep your Eyez on the chart, LoL!!
Great comeback, you sound like a 2nd grader. Congrats http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cherrypicking.asp#axzz2Kc0hV69I "rather than having to research all the stocks that deal with semi-conductors within the exchanges, an investor may instead look at a few mutual funds investing exclusively in these products and research only those investments picked out to be the best performers. " Common industry term, you should know this? Guess you aren't in the industry.
We specialize in the indexes. Check surf report since 2002 for uncanny accurate calls. The system is still being tweaked for commodities. surf
So you call out Eyez for using the "royal WE", but it's ok for YOU to refer to yourself as "WE". Who is the "we", you and your pet hamster?