Logical Fallacy. Simple because you have an audited track record, doesn't prevent you from saying something incredibly stupid, nor does membership in various exchanges prevent you from acting like an asshole. All anyone need do is read through your delusional rants to see the evidence for themselves. In addition, nobody is "anti-markbrown" in the crowd on ET. Again, get over yourself. Your participation in this thread (and in the markets in general) affects no one. Many ET members do respond negatively to ass-hats such as yourself. Perhaps, your delusional behavior and not your username or fee generating web site, precipitate such animosity. Lastly, I am impressed with your laser-like focus and priority driven responses. Proof of your mental dexterity exists within this very thread. Someone who touts their trading accomplishments at every turn just spent the entire trading day arguing with people on the internet. Wow. Impressive. In anticipation of yet another delusional rant, I've popped some popcorn and plan to sit back and enjoy the show - now that my trading day has ended. Watching you burst a vein should provide excellent entertainment. What a %&$@'n clown. - Spydertrader
Where did I "belittle" and "ridicule" everything you have worked so hard for? All I said was I, yes I, believe that the human mind is still the best computer and thats why I, yes I, choose to harness all that I can out of it so that I continue to trade well. I even mentioned the fact that I tried sitting down and coming up with potential code for how I trade but kept hitting bumps in the road as I kept realizing that small subtle details were left out. THEN I found that it was more trouble than it was worth TO ME. You do what you do and I will do what I do. Whoever said we cant coexist?? You come out of nowhere calling me an idiot and whatnot. I dont think I have ever even spoken to you on the boards in my 4 years here.
Really? ROTFLMAO!!! I'm not the one begging for clues in Spydie's forum... so, as I said, crawl back to Candyland. You belong there.
No you are the one who says one thing, gets called out, and then tries to distract everyone by bringing up old posts in other threads. This thread, this very day, you said one thing which, when given the opposite viewpoint, failed to enlighten your hypocracy. If someone doesnt understand a method and cannot figure out how to backtest it, then SURELY that method must not be able to work right?? I mean, you said it yourself, people give backtesting a hard time cause they cant do it right? Wake up brother, you are such a HUGE hypocrite, I cant even stand it
You're exactly right Spydie, it would be a HUGE logical fallacy for anyone in the Hershey cult to provide an audited, profitable public track record.
You can't even spell, let alone think or reason. That's not what I said at all... go back to school and learn to read, OK?
Here's what you said (also quoted below from earlier today): "Well said... some think that because they can't make backtesting work for them that it doesn't work... so they go the discretionary route and delude themselves about how superior their "beautiful minds" are to computers." Here's what I said: "Well said....some think that because they cant make trading the Hershey method work for them that it doesnt work...so they go the backtesting route and delude themselves about how superior their computers are to their own minds." You argue that people cant make backtesting work so they go the discretionary route, all the while hanging onto the notion that you believe backtesting works. My arguement is essentially the same logically, only the opposite viewpoint. So please, do explain yourself, it seems you have gotten yourself in a pickle and I am giving you the opportunity to explain yourself.
Trader666 is a girl???????? If thats the case, its no wonder she doesnt understand logic, very few girls do and her emotional state makes perfect sense now, I understand her need for hissy fits