I'm not seeing where Bill Barr dismissed the charts I've found and produced here. I see he doesn't cite any specifics, and told Trump as early as Nov. 23 he thought there were no specifics. That's way too early to have any information investigated in the field and report back. It looks like prejudice. These charts are specific, and match my own experience of monitoring the election that night. So I'm going to have to call bullshit on Barr. He gave you the reason he didn't find any evidence: he didn't want to be a part of a precedence in case Biden was actually the winner. So, he assumed elections were bulletproof, and so, he did not have anyone investigate. He doesn't cite any specific investigation, considered, and dismissed. What he did do is send out a letter to offices saying if you hear anything, to let him know. He didn't, so far as I know, order an investigation into anything he heard. Possibly he didn't hear anything. And possibly none of the offices felt obligated to tell him anything they may have heard, even if they heard it. The FBI, after all, IS politicized. The way Trump put it, Barr did not look. Clearly Barr never saw the charts I've shown. If he saw them and didn't order an investigation then I call more than just bullshit on Barr. In best case scenario he is an old man who can't think like a criminal, and so, can't imagine how an election could even be stolen. Call him what you will, "Trump DOJ", just don't call him late for dinner. Lincoln had McClellan. Trump had Barr. Part of the confusion is that since the Obama-Holder dynamic duo, the DOJ is supposed to be the president's wingman. Barr wanted his legacy to be Not Trump's Wingman.
No I just think Lincoln was a good president. Oh you mean Trump? No, I'm nobody's disciple, and, like Lincoln, don't go to any church. I was one of the earliest followers of Trump on Twitter going back to maybe 2012 when I followed ten celebrities including the Pope. He was always the best celebrity. But I unsubscribed when he bombed Syria after being duped by the deep state. Btw, I'm sure you won't mind mentioning which church you go to if it's not a cult. I'm just wondering where you learned about these so-called "ways of Christ", if you think I don't already know the ways.
you call bullshit on the lack of proof something exists... OK boomer... Nothing is true until it is proven...... so far no proof there was any major election fraud that swung the election to Biden just like there was no election fraud in 2016 when trump won just like there was no election fraud in 2016 when GOP took House and Senate......just like there was no election fraud when dems took back house and senate etc... whiny diahrrhea is not proof.
Actually, because of the election theft in 2020 at the presidential level, we now have no idea how many elections have been stolen before, at House, Senate and state levels. Or how many more will be stolen. I called bullshit on Barr's claim to not have any evidence while it is clear Barr never investigated because he naively has faith in the system. There is no proof he did any kind of investigation on any one specific issue in any state. He certainly didn't look at, investigate, and dismiss the charts I've shown. Barr dismissed any theft on the 23rd of November. If so, it was the fastest and deepest investigation the FBI ever did in history. The reason was clear, as he stated: He didn't want to get involved in what he thought was not possible. That's called prejudice. With that attitude, no, your not going to see any evidence.
l Your responses to this thread would indicate otherwise. My church is the natural world. My communion is in Direct Experience. It was a rhetorical supposition. I have no idea if you care for the less fortunate, or give of your attention to those in need. It was not intended as a personal affront.
Compared to Christ, everybody is less fortunate. Probably why I don't feel the need for class warfare on the so-called rich. They don't look rich to me. My main motivation to support Trump is I don't like bullies. Together, the main media is one big bully punching down on someone weaker. I resent that to the degree the weaker warrior represents me, or the best of mankind. I am especially disgusted with cognitive dissonance, hypocrisy, and lying to masses of people to get enough votes to maintain power. Power to what? Power to grift. And in the case of covid, the power to shut people completely down and redistribute funds unfairly. So I would prefer to have a man in office who has already attained his earthly wealth, and doesn't need to grift to supplement his government issued income. I share the wealth of my wisdom in another of these forums for rich or poor alike, however they see themselves.
If what you assert is true, McConnell would have not won re-election, nor any republican. How convenient that it's stolen elections when Democrats win. Giuliani promoted the Big Lie and he's about to be indicted for it. Look at the list of folks who wanted presidential pardons for their role in the insurrection. DT is at the center of a criminal enterprise. It is coming to light and regardless of your beliefs about it, the wheels of justice are turning.