Oh, nobody and mean nobody here has bitched about that more here than I have. I cannot be humble there due to its having been and still being hot button for me. It is just the that the last couple posts I did I ended by saying that I would not be posting on it more because I know that it gets no traction here and people are not interested. But out of my usual generosity of spirit I will allow your outrage to be equal to mine but not greater. The thing that gets me and is bullshit is that the lefties and righties who want to maintain the scam argue that it interfering with people's food choices and telling them what they can and cannot eat. That's bullshit. Total bullshit. The issue is about what taxpayers should fund in the name of nutrition. If you and your family want to have mountain dew and milk duds and jujy fruits for breakfast take your own goddam money go do exactly that. I got into this recently again for one more bite at the topic because I said that that would be one of the good things to come out of Bobby being appointed. He would question why we were funding foods with negative health benefits in the name of nutrition while grandma can no longer afford any meat in her diet. Yeh, and no one needs to enlighten me about how both parties have supported it due to lobbyists and campaign donations. I FRIGGING GET IT AND HAVE SINCE I WAS A TEENAGER DUH. The whole thing is outrageous. The amount of food assistance going to sodas is just total bullshit. It may only be about 6-12% depending on the state but that is still a massive real dollar number that could be reallocated to....well.....errr.....food. Returning to the topic of dogs.....and food..........here is a good boy right here who deserves a big steak. He ain't much to look at but he get the job done without a lot of drama: