Yeah, but you said climate "change". Could be that half of those august bodies believe the earth is cooling, while the other half believe it to be warming. Both are change, right?
Now there's an important one Oh c'mon, everyone knows they're just a marijuana farm. Is that the one located in the three story mud hut in the center of town? Were not these the same guys studying UFO's and ESP? Oh BTW don't forget AL Whore.
What a pathetic response. Not to mention arrogant and bigoted. Feel free to name any national science academy housed in mud huts or otherwise that disputes AGW.
<a href=http://www.getsmileyface.com><img src=http://www.getsmileyface.com/new/smileys/15.gif border=0><br><font face=arial size=1>Smiley Face</font></a>
Plenty of eminent scientists dispute it or at least dispute the notion that it is settled science. Similarly, even among those who consider the theory sound, a substantial number would be forced to agree that any realistic "mitigating" steps we could take will be ineffectual. Much of this is driven by two things. One, pervasive indoctrination of gullible young people who want to feel good about themselves and who are too ignorant to look at it critically, and two, a cynical power grab by world-government socialists.
"Plenty..." A vast minority can be "plenty." Fact is that you can't counter the scientific organizations with anything but "plenty." LOL!!! What actually is important to note is that the right wing party of the "All powerful United States of America" thinks human beings are too weak and powerless to influence weather patterns... I wonder if they ever heard of a common very simple human practice of seeding clouds... I guess to the science hating ignorant right wing idiots seeding clouds isn't in the Bible, so it must not exist...
funny stuff ... It's completed almost the entire life-cycle: Inception Ocscar Award Billions in funding to the "Consensus" "Deniers and Naysayers" Snowing in October Laughable Joke I only hope it completes the cycle,... Tarring and Feathering
Obviously "plenty" isn't sufficient or they are not "eminent" enough or they would have forced national science bodies somewhere to change their stance. The evidence AND the great weight scientific opinion does not dispute AGW. They will certainly be ineffectual if nothing substantial is done, which remains pretty much the situation as of today. Far, far more climate researches (not to mention the IPCC) are advocating serious measures to control CO2 emissions than throwing up their hand and moaning that it's all too hard. Right wing gibberish. All too often those that most loudly proclaim their capacity for critical thinking, in reality posses the least. I think Al Gore recently said something about the Right having severed the golden thread of Reason. Very true. This is a scientific fact? Or something that just exists in the fevered minds of right wing conspiracy nuts. Of the countries represented in Copenhagen, how many have an explicitly socialist government, or profess a socialist agenda. Even more importantly, how many of the countries that really matter (ie the ones that dominate world geo-politics) fit that bill? At the end of the day the climate doesn't give a fig about democrats or autocrats, or about capitalism or socialism.
If the whole global warming scam is true, then the coast of Long Island will look like this in about 100 years. Whats the problem? GLOBAL WARMING RULES.