It's a bit difficult for me to see the bars an your chart. Is there a way to make the bars a tad thicker in line weight? Staying with these charts and applying the debriefing, add the turns and trend types. You could also make your channels more transparent so that they can fade in the background. You're at a point where you can let go of the training wheels.
I've just rebuilt by myself the log and will go in town soon to print a bunch of logs with bar numbers of the log and the scale of the chart sync'd. Use leftmost T1.... this changes everything..thank you very much. Did I miss this anywhere in the litterature ? in the EE sheet ? I don't see it. This is new for me. Logically I had DDd that being as when any PP! comes into view, P1 is assigned on the next bar, then its associated P1 was on it too. I'm gonna do it the way you say now, even though I don't understand for now the logic behind this way of placing the BM. I don't care if it's difficult. You know me more than a bit. I want to face anything Let's incoporate anything that is required/needed. Thank you I apologize and hope what follows is what you expected : Let's do that
1st part first refinement before trend/turns Maybe a silly question but I do wonder about : now the bars are thicker, how to put, precisely, the tl ? on the angle or on the middle of the bar's H/L ? I mean, like the blue or black tl here the LTL appears to only be placeable on the middle of the H/L)
3nd part first refinement before trend/turn Interesting things here after refining, that I see : - on 12:45 bar, in addition to the BO,T1 I also see an Ab EE. - on 13:50 bar, Lat becomes active on an after-squishing-SYM (I notice while I write I did not refine it on my log, sorry) and there is IV. I DD with the risk of being wrong, that there is UL. So I measured now volume on that bar and got a P2. This makes the subsequent bar an Ab EE. While refining this part of the chart, several little comprehensions came to my mind, and just disappeared ASA they had come. I'll try to refind them and post my DDs : From , I understand then now that to have a BO,T1 we do not necessarily need a volume trough on the bar that does BO. We just need a T1 in the sequence before the BO. Maybe this is wrong, but if it's a correct DD, it will help and change a lot of things for me. Another thing : The leftmost event... I think there was something more but it seems it really got out of my mind as quick as it had entered...can't remember...Most likely I'll remember it soon.
4th part first refinement before trend/turn Lots of cascading effects after re-IDs on this part. Great feelings. Finally, I don't see the Lat inside the Lat as previously ID'd, no Af but Ae EE etc. The only thing that bothers me a bit is when the second Lat becomes active. At 14:55, there is BO,T1 and we're not in a Lat yet. So P1 is assigned. But, the next bar shows a Lat so P1 is to be assigned (if I correctly follow what has been recently stated) on the next measurable bar, so in this case Lat4. I just wonder how to deal with that into the log. That's why I put this arrow made by hand crossing the log from P1's column towards Retro of bar 68 into the log. I'm also adjusting the Band boxes (yellow, pink, blue) with the leftmost event. Incorporating all this new things is way less overwhelming than yesterday.
Leftmost is a concept explicitly applied to P1, T2P or T2F in the tables. The sequences get clearer for me when I applied it to T1 which I use as a current operating point. BM's are place on all EE's. The assigned P1 is variable depending on which band is active.
- first BO,T1 is after an Ab EE. MT test : the only place where I can locate a (n-1 = Ab) -> (n=BO,T1) is in the Routine's Set B. As I know, the process is, no matter how we choose to start, self-correcting. So when that first BO,T1 comes, let's say we're in Set B AND, being as the n EE is in the list, we have C-turn AND if we were in a Set B, the prior event in the OOE of turns must have been A-turn AND then, when 10:05 bar comes, we enter into a Set A of trends. Let's label it this way and go forward. We are in Set A, at next EE, n-1 EE will be BO,T1, so we'll be looking in the FS's cell of Set A if next EE is listed. - next EE is PP5. It is present in the list of n EEs, so we have C-turn, a Set A has been completed. We are in Set A, next EE, n-1 EE will be PP5. We'll have to look into the Routine cell of Set A to search for a pairing. BUT, in this cell of MT, no PP5 is there in the n-1 list. We will not find any pairing (if that is true, there's a Aha being unlocked as for "you know one turn in advance). My current DD -> we'll not have C-turn, so we'll have A turn. AND, to know if this A-turn will be still part of a Set A or not, we'll do MR test. - next EE is BM,rev. As stated just above, we have no pairing. We have A-turn. Is that part of a Set A or do we advance in Set B ? We do MR test. My current DD -> I look into the MR, in Routine's cell of Set A (because the n EE is a PP!). There is no PP5 listed. So there is no reversal so there is no C-turn so there is an A-turn SO we are now into a Set B. We are in Set B. At next EE, n-1 EE will be BM,rev. So we'll have to look into FS's cell of Set B and look for a pairing. - next EE is BO,T1. We have no pairing. We have B-turn, still in Set B. Are we going to Set C? MR test : My current DD : I look into the FS's cell of Set B of the MR and search for a reversal when BO,T1 is a B-turn -> it is present (here I don't know if my reasoning follows the logic of the MR). There is a possibility to find a B-turn with BO,T1. So I'd say here we stay into Set B. The B-turn is inbetween () of a Set B. We are in Set B, at next EE, n-1 EE will be BO,T1 and we'll be looking into the FS's cell of Set B of MT to search for a pairing. - next EE is PP3. From BO,T1, there is no pairing so there is no C-turn, so we have A-turn. Are we going to Set C ? MR test ------------------ I was just gonna erase all this, as it appears clear to me I'm not getting it. I need to reread your posts about the MR. For example I need to unlock this.