Well... I have been quite paralysed by what just happened. I would lie if I said it did not affect me in many contradictory ways. What surges from all this is that....whatever is happening on this thread, however anyone here behaves him/herself, whatever whichever whoever ... I just have no other option to continue my quest and the work I've been doing for around 4 years now. I know nobody will do for me what I have to do for myself. It could be not that way, but as it is not, I choose to continue for myself and by myself. Showing objectively to anyone he/she is wrong when he/she says no matter what, reminding anyone what he/she did/said in the past to me, would not serve my work, nor any other person using my work nowadays or in the future. I know each person in this world is not universally speaking an onthological human being anymore, fine for me, I won't face any ego. That's the real "you-with-you" job. My personal goal is twice and unique : reach the point where there is no reason not to be in the market at any given time AND let people around me and even beyond, enjoy the fruits of my work whithout having to do what I personally did to get it. I just want a more tender life for them, and want to offer it to them. That's what I am, and nothing/nobody will change this. So, I'm currently working silently on a PC permission-VTP-EEs merging mindmap AND filling logs for and by my own to help myself with building the big mindmap. I'm also retaking my Great Matrix in the best way it can be done : universally, thoroughly and functionally. Best wishes to everyone, and sorry for my absence but what happened some days ago affected me a lot. Back on the road towards "always-in"...
So many threads of the method have been derailed, just when things were coming together,...oh well, it is what it is. When experiencing difficulty, go back to a last known good to keep moving forward. Trust the process of MADA by annotating a chart and filling in a log, debriefing and iterative refinement. Concentration and focus are your allies as well as better-feeling thoughts. As for your mindmap, it is helpful to align it with how one would process bars as per the VTP. In other words have your mindmap also include a bar number axis and a volume element axis. That’s when the feature of being able to collapse and expand nodes provides benefit to keep the map simple and clear. ie. At the first P1 what are the possible bars from here? A repeat, a wait, a T1, etc. each as collapsed nodes that reveal encapsulated branching when expanded. By having the nodes positioned spatially as per the VTP, one always has a ‘start here’ P1 position, whenever the OOE resets. In essence the P1 is the trunk of a windswept tree and all EE’s are leaves that require a specific and distinct path to arrive at.
That is precisely the exact point I'm at currently. It's what I've arrived by myself to, and it's revealing to me as being the exercise of all the exercises (building the mindmap), and once it's built and used, then it formalizes in the end in a recollection of infos named the log, and at last it expresses itself with clarity on an annotated chart.
Full MADA on 03/04/19 w/ logs 'Been working since 11am and it's 9pm. See you tomorrow for debrief and more MADA.
Alternating constantly from theorical approach (building the mindmap itself by hand) to its practical application (log) in order to get the PC-VTP-EE merged mindmap (MdMp) definitely, thoroughly and functionally built, here is it a little Aha DDd on "this can be 2 EEs but it's rather more this one" :
When performing the VTP: 1) Check for repeat; the result is ‘T’ or ‘F’ in the same column as the row above, 2) Check for Rev Chron; the result being ‘<-‘ arrow above the ‘T’ or ‘F’ which has one check for the prior element as per ‘volume element ranges’ OR a circle around the ‘T’ or ‘F’ starting in the upper right corner of the cell and traveling counter-clockwise around the ‘T’ or ‘F’ as per the ‘Volume Element Ranges’. (Most often when T1 = ‘F’ and ‘X’ is in the P1 column) The OOE is always P1->T1->P2... as the trend advances. P1->T1->P1 does not exist as a single directional trend segment. P1->T1->P1assigned could but that would have WCB as P1->T1->BO,T1 This is a retrace sequence. If BO,T1 AND BM,rev then Reversal is underway. The reason this handwritten gesture nuance is important will become self-evident as trend segments contain more bars. If you fail to incorporate this now, ID’ing higher (more bars) bands will have greater difficulty. For EE’s that contain more bars, the circling gesture would in fact contain more ‘F’. This is what Jack is referring to when he states ‘collecting Falses’ to advance a trend. In general, your bar ID’s are getting better and as you debrief your work, you’ll continue to naturally auto-correct. Complete each log throughly with the distinctions already on the table which would include BM’s and which is the correct side of the market on any given bar.
Everything of the method have been presented and exposed. The only thing that is missing is the deduction that it's up to anyone able to perform it, that leads to link it all together. Some things are defined in an incomplete maneer, others are defined in a fuzzy/not precise maneer that clears up when linked to peripherically linked other items that are clearly and non-fuzzily defined. The greedy will always loose in here.
For the Great MdMap linking PC-VTP-EE : There are three different contexts that must be planted on the P1 assigned to be sure which EE can appear/can't surge : -> a LAT is already present so P1ass appears into a LAT -> P1ass creates a LAT -> there's no LAT before nor on P1ass (so it's on any other price case = AOPC) Here is a part of the AOPC context MdMp for beginning with P1ass.
Not sure if I understand properly what you said here, but gonna give my best to get it right and apply it on next logs. Thank you for the intervention and have a nice day.