Thanks a lot Sorry, I'll make it clearer ! BS is for Black Stitch, RS for Red Stitch. Which is the best way of labeling a red or black stitch ? Ok for retro Got it Some issue here. From what we lastly discussed, degap meant stick the last bar of prior day to the first one of next day. I see a Degap column in the Log, yes, but I don't understand what it means when it's for every bar. Can you help please ? So let's ID BM and BO,T1 ? Still struggling with ID EE's and PP's. I'll soon post some questions on the VTP which is my very first focus currently.
Should have said on the VTP and on End Effects Here is a serie of descriptions of each EE I have. In red, find my questions. Question 1 The PP1 is the ACCELERATING P1's. PP1a Three P2's happen and there is acceleration. So the PP1a has been invented. -> Three P2's....in a row ? or each 3 P2's appearing in a sequence we put PP1a and from there we continue to count until 3 P2s and so on ? Plus, "there is acceleration" -> does that mean all three P2 need to increase compared to each prior one ? Question 2 PP3 Okay. You get two P1's one after another, no exceptions. Volume lands BETWEEN the two P1 values on the third bar of the trend. PP3a Same as PP3 except........ you have a wait in the form of a lateral BEFORE you get the T1. -> is that last T1 a tipo ? It's not about T1s here on PP3, but about P1's. Lost here ! Question 3 PP4 PP5 PP5a These are OB type turns. As you remember OB's have an upper level and a lower NEXT level. You do a volume test and get a peak on the upper level. Naturally, the Next on the lower level is a trough. -> this may be the occasion to explain my problem on the VTP when OB surge. I understand there is two levels and we test the first time (first level, upper one) the volume bar of that OB appearing, it's whichever volume point in the OOE, and the next level is assigned by following this order. What I do not get is what "next" level really concretely mean ? I mean, I have an OB appearing, I divide my row in the log in two, on the upper level I test the volume bar concerned by the OB, and we test the next volume element...but it's still the same volume bar we're to test ?.. no ? Plus, as on any OB there're two opposite tapes, how to procede as for VTP ? I miss something here and this stopps me in the progression of the VTP. Can you too please remember me if Black/Red Stitch and FBP/FTP are price cases giving permission to measure volume ? Question 4 When doing the VTP and logging, a SYM appear, on lower volume compared to prior volume bar, we have to wait. Then the next bar appear, price case gives permission to measure volume. At this time, we repeat the same volume test we did before the SYM appeared, we do a test for repeat. But, we compare the level of this last volume bar to SYM's volume bar on which we waited, or on the bar prior to SYM ?
PP3: "Volume lands between P1's", means what volume element? OB's have two levels, which mean one extra "row" of logging. P OB's are dominant, so D-nD. T OB's non-dominant, so nD-D, regarding volume. We don't really have exact volume values though may assume relativistic volumes. PP1a: The sheets are said to have exact formulas. Some posts adds a bit to them and provide context. They need R&D. Good to work on FS together with volume elements and bands. What Jack has not provided is the system, so one need to always do iterative refinement from current understanding.
Maybe a pic helps answer a few questions. Here is an auto-annotated volume snip from around noon today. The instrument, time frame, price pane and containers are not included, nor necessary for the questions the pic may help answer. As an aside, a really fun and interesting exercise is to imagine the price pane. And then compare imagined versus real. Do this on your own setup with an isolated volume snip where your personal annotation methods were used. It's a very worthwhile exercise imo.
Focusing on volume, here's price maybe. Those who want to do this exercise themselves, do it first before looking.
Fantastic work @Simples!! Fantastic! Overall, this was a small piece of a non-dom consolidation zig-zag within a larger down container. The yellow-ish Hz in the middle was a POC. The broken green Hz was zig-zag support. The zig-zag was about 150 minutes old at the time. Attached is the actual. Great work @Simples!
There was some volume labels I yet don't know, so hard exercise. I just looked at your result after posting mine @Simples , congrats ! Thank you @tiddlywinks for that kind of active sharing