Remaining-to-be-studied nodes were : N DOJI IBGS test box. Arrive at N VIA M before or after lock in of bar n +1. OR Arrive at N coming from U VIA T or V which come from R and S. Perform DOJI test as PASS when price has moved through or beyond the open of the bar. PASS feeds back goes to “X” for an EXIT J or K IF and WHEN non dominance results. Under bar dominance feedback to E VIA P occurs and F or G is selected immediately as an n+1 bar. Perform DOJI test as FAIL when price does NOT move through or beyond the open of the bar. FAIL The first I wanna do here is rephrasing the first phrase ; arrive at N via M before or after lock in of the bar you entered. I know M is the situation where doji happens. At this moment, we’re sent to N to perform the doji test. Here, thanks to the text, I also learn that you can arrive at N coming from U via T which comes from R and S. R from memory is increasing vol same color. S is increasing volume same color superior to prior trough. Manifestly, this nodes involves too many nodes to be studied properly at the moment. I’ll end this post with studying it. R Main “Continuation” NODE Arrive at R coming from Q on an n+2 bar. Proceed to lock in as increasing volume continues. Proceed to “X” exit if and when volume declines below lock in. After lock in, proceed to feedback Y box , then to Q to repeat R or S. R is defined by increasing volume move w/ same color. We arrive at R by choosing it when we’re at Q. We proceed to lock in as increasing volume continues . This sentence could confirm that we’re talking about PRV. Then we proceed to X exit if and when volume declines below lock in. Again, this makes me think about PRV. I think it’s about PRV we’re talking about here. It could alternate along its successive measurements and announce an anticipated final volume level one time above LI, another time below etc. This would send us to X to A to choose B/C, then to F to L and, hold until next bar opens and be at Q where you can once again choose R//S etc. After lock in we proceed to feedback Y box and go to Q to repeat R/S. This would be the case, from what I understand, in which volume keeps on increasing and Dom continues so we hold bar after bar, but, taking into consideration that we could be sent to X at anytime during any bar by J/K. S Main “Continuation” NODE for PM Break out PACE change. Arrive at S coming from Q on an n+2 bar. Proceed to lock in as increasing volume continues. Proceed to “X” exit if and when volume declines below lock in. After lock in, proceed to feedback Y box , then to Q to repeat R or S. S also deal with dominance, but this time it’s not a mere increasing volume w/ same color, but it’s increasing volume > prior trough and same color AND with post 157 of ExSc thread, I know it’s the sandwich node. It reminds me the pattern. And more precisely it deals with the circled zone in the attached drawing. What happens here ? I feel we’re in S node zone. For me, the following phrase from JH in the post 157 confirms : This is a situation where on one fractal you are holding a profit segment AND within that container there are faster fractals going through their routine of the pattern. I am beginning to be very convinced of the truth of my prior post when I talked about the ticks… Of course, to reach the level of extracting all the possible Dom moves and the possible non-Dom moves in function of the fractal level, I understand that JH says : to get that sophisticated we need to go through 10 cycles. I understand better the necessity of the tools. T “OR” NODE Pass through T going from R. Choose U to GATE to N when a DOJI occurs. Revert to S when volume is not peaking but is maintaining above the prior trough.. My comprehension is that T is a node through which we pass, starting from R, when a doji appears. T is the gate of N when we’re at R. Just a sec : what would from R to N via T mean ? It would mean dominance is at play and, for example, price begins to go from long to short (in the case N test passes). If so, then this would be a Dom-Dom situation. Reminds me C-turn on MT AND Set A especially. Then, if volume does not peak but is still above prior trough, we go back to S. This sentence makes T2P bell ring inside my head. Although I’m not a 100% sure about that, I feel this node is quite clear for me. To be continued...
U “OR” GATING NODE Use U to GATE R or S depending upon DOJI or non DOJI circumstance. DOJI goes to N. Non DOJI goes to feedback box AFTER lock in W. According to the MADA doc, U is a choice node, and N and W and the choices. STOP. I just thought about something right now. At the beginning, when I entered into FCC1, I thought in each column I had to find every possibility of surge (for both P and V) for the given bar I was at. I’ve DDd this is partly true. I see right now, J, K and N as the nodes that are those at which arrive in any given value of n so at any moment of any bar. Effectively, Any bar can at any moment see its PRV fall below prior bar, and this would be J ; or it can more precisely fall below prior volume bar AND its color could change. By the way, I notice here I could DD that there would be non difference between seeing PRV fall below prior w/ no volume change and being at J node. Maybe that’s implicit in J node. The other case (falling PRV w/ color change) would be K. Back to U node. So we use U (that takes us to either doji test or W) to gate to R/S depending upon Doji or non Doji circumstances. Rephrased : if doji is there, we use U to gate to N if doji happens ;if not, we choose either R or S. And then, if no Doji appears, the other option for U is effectively W, which is what confirms the text. The box we’d use then for feedback towards Q is Y. V “OR” NODE Pass through V going from S. Choose U to GATE to N when a DOJI occurs. U can also GATE to the feedback box Y when a doji doe NOT occur. Remain in S when volume is not peaking but is maintaining above the prior trough. T was a « choice node » that we pass through when going from R. Here I see V node is a choice node that we pass trough, but when coming from S. What is the difference between R and S ? R is increasing volume move w/ same color. While S is increasing move above prior trough. But I’ve learned this is maybe unprecise being as in the Ex Sc Thread I’ve seen volume doesn’t necessarily need to peak for being at S. We only need volume not to be below prior trough AND to have the same color as the trough in question. So, any volume level at this step of the path being above prior trough and with the same color would be both R and S, but more like an S. A peak volume here could also be. And if it’s the same color as prior bar, that would be R. Then what if the bar was peaking above prior w/ change of color ? I don’t know atm. So V is a choice node and we pass through it when we come from the sandwich node. MADA doc states V is a choice node, at which X and U are the choices. At X we exit. At U we choose between N and W. N is in the case of doji surge while W is for lock in. Once again : what if volume falls below prior w/ same color ? J ; what if same volume move but color changes ? K. U can gate to N if doji occurs ; if doji does not occur, we choose W. This means if doji does not happen, then W must happen ? …strange. In the end, if volume is not peaking but remains above prior trough, we stay at S. So this would reduce the possibility of taking the path to J or K. It would be then here : - If volume falls below prior w/ same color AND under prior trough : J - If volume falls below prior w/ color change AND under prior trough : K - If volumes falls below prior BUT remains above prior trough whatever the color is : S S seems to look like N, but for volume. Not feeling great with that node. W Lock In NODE Sit at W when R or S volume exceeds the prior bar volume. Hold through end of bar and proceed to feedback to Q VIA feedback box Y. There are nodes that I do not like atm. W is not part of these. I feel comfortable with it. I see like a kind of « L2 » or like « L node for n+2 column ». In the MADA doc I learn that W is the lock in apperance for an R or S type. We hold until EOB. And then, as I see it : two possibilities : either doji happens, then we go to N, or it does not and we meet lock in and then we’d go to Y feedback to Q and choos R/S again. “X” EXIT NODE “X” is the post peaking volume condition on any dominant trend. Arrive at “X” when any ENTER or HOLD node fails OR Arrive at “X” when the DOJI PASSES but fails to remain a dominant bar. It’s not hate, but I don’t like this node ^^. I put some hope into the following study of it. I’d like it to be my friend, like any other node. Ok, end of humor. X is the exit node. Let me explain why I don’t like this node. By definition, as seen in the 3x5 cards, X is the exit node. FCC1 is for taking Dom segments. So we want to enter at the end of each non-Dom, hold, exit when Dom ends IF non-Dom follows, and reverse when Dom ends to be followed by opposite Dom. It reminds me Set A for example. So, synthesis : when do we exit in FCC1 ? When non-Dom arrives. In terms of node, which node is for exiting ? X. Ok, so far, good. Now, which nodes have I seen to predate X ? from memory, J and K. And what are J and K aluding to ? Non-Dom situations. So what do we do on J or K ? We go to X, so we exit. It looks good. Yes it does. BUT, in the MADA doc I can read : X is a point where either J or K type failure occurs. I remember I have already mentionned, maybe shelled this crux. As I understand it, J and K are non-Dom cases, generally speaking (the crux may come from the generally word). So if these nodes fail to occur, it means non-Dom fail to occur, so Dom occurs. Before exposing what I’m sensing new now, let’s pursue the study of the text about X node. As I can read, X is the post volume peaking condition on any dominant trend. Rephrased : X is when volume stops peaking so decreases and begins its road towards trough. So this is the nature of Non-Dom move. Thus why we exit when this happens. In addition, we arrive at X when any Enter or Hold node fails. This reminds me, logically, J/K, H, NotL nodes. OR We can arrive at X when doji passes but fails to remain a dominant bar. Rephrased : we exit when M happens THEN when N test passes AND if volume drops below prior. This situation, as I see it for now, would describe the failure to Dom-Dom surge on intrabar. Otherwise, I think for now (I’ve not shelled enough N node) we would reverse being as inside a given bar we’d pass from a Dom to the opposite Dom move. Being here in FCC1 to only take Dom segments, two segments would be there to be profited. Before advancing to the next 2+1 (+1 = N node) node study, I need to expose why I see the « J or K type failure » slightly different compared to..how I saw it along last days. First, I know that JH sometimes makes typos. It is possible that this is a typo and that the true sentence was : X is when J or K type occurs. Or, maybe, and it’s the last option I see for now : maybe X would cover the surge of « NotJ » AND « Not K » cases. In other words : non-Dom w/ same color. This would mirror the passage from Dom to Dom opposite color. Here, it would be the passage from Dom to non-Dom same color. After rereading what I just wrote, It still causes dissonance to me for now. I need to rest. Y Feedback Box Arrive at the feedback box when a dominant trend exceeds three bars including the trough starting point. Proceed to Q the select R or S on the open of the next bar. There is nothing I can say about this node except the way I understand it looks clear to me AND that one can find where my comprehension of it comes, by reading this and prior recent posts. Z GATE NODE Z distributes the PASS of A DOGI IBGS bar price test . In cycle 1, this is the ONLY price measurement. A color change has occurred on the test so a reversal trade results. A reversal is two trades (exit and enter in opposite direction) or a double contract value exit. According to MADA doc, Z is for when N test passes. We are then at Z, which is a choice node : either X so we exit, or E. I must say that this flow provides me a confirmation of what I don’t know if it’s a nice Aha for the FCC1, and what I’m referring to is that I have noticed that we can be sent from a node to another that does not pertain to the column we were in. In the case that we’re in n +2 for example, let’s say we choose R and doji appears. Fromm y current LOU, wAccording to MADA doc, Z is for when N test passes. We are then at Z, which is a choice node : either X so we exit, or E. I must say that this flow provides me a confirmation of what I don’t know if it’s a nice Aha for the FCC1, and what I’m referring to is that I have noticed that we can be sent from a node to another that does not pertain to the column we were in. In the case that we’re in n +2 for example, let’s say we choose R and doji appears. Fromm y current LOU, we’d be sent to N, and if it passes, we’d be possibly sent to E which is in the n+1 column. It is confirmed anyway by the text in the corner formed by the feedback loop conecting E node and IBGS box on FCC1. At E we’d choose F or G. All this looks congruent so far with the first statement of the Z node text in the 3x5 : Z distributes the pass of a doji IBGS bar price test. Then, I learn that in cycle 1, the doji = N test is the only price measurement. The way it is said makes me think I’ll find more price measurements in the next cycles. I’ll surely quote this sentence is the future either to confirm or infirm it. Finally, a reversal is two trades (exit and enter in opposite direction) or a double contract value exit. And I don’t understand for now this last information. N DOJI IBGS test box. Arrive at N VIA M before or after lock in of bar n +1. OR Arrive at N coming from U VIA T or V which come from R and S. Perform DOJI test as PASS when price has moved through or beyond the open of the bar. PASS feeds back goes to “X” for an EXIT J or K IF and WHEN non dominance results. Under bar dominance feedback to E VIA P occurs and F or G is selected immediately as an n+1 bar. Perform DOJI test as FAIL when price does NOT move through or beyond the open of the bar. FAIL Let’s end this node. It’s the core node. The node of all nodes. I’ve passed on the first statement. What does the second say ? Arrive at N coming from U via T or V which come from R or S. So when we’re at Q, we choose R/S. During R/S type, IF I’VE MADE PROPERLY THE CORRECTION ON THE MADA DOC AS NEEDED, we hold for V for (J/K) at X or U. If I remember correctly, I’ve already discussed the way of understanding this as : We hold for V for J/K at (X or U) OR We hold for (V for J/K) or for (U). At the moment, I feel overwhelmed a bit unfortunately. All the goal here is to manage, piece by piece, to put the nodes inside LTM, which is already happening greatly to me but it’s sometimes hard to nest everything in one stone that is ready to provide the suitable answer. All the matter is to manage to gather and link everything at the same time in mind and…atm I’m a bit tired so I won’t be able to DD much more about it. My understanding of the next two statements is that : when a doji test happens, two options are possible. Either it passes or it fails. And for each case, either volume could be Dom or non Dom. If N test passes AND volume is non-Dom, then it takes one to A via J/K through X. If N test passes AND volume is Dom : feedback to E and select F or G immediately the bar as a n+1 (new confirmation my new understanding has trueness). I see this situation as Dom swiches. This makes me think about reverse. If N test fails AND volume is Dom : according to the FCC1 feedback loop, via P we go to E too. I’d have rather said that this is the signal of Dom is still here so we Hold. If N test fails and volume is Non Dom : I’d say same result as N test passs/vol non-Dom : exit to A via J/K through X. I would have loved to keep on working but I’m done for today. Tomorrow will be dedicated to Best wishes to everyone.
Before going into this, I wanted to operate a little back to the basics move. This is something referred to the core. Just a reminder. What are the possible volume moves ? -> INC, DEC, PEAK ,TROUGH. -Which form can a Peak have ? end of move above beginning or below. - which from can a trough have ? end of move above or below beginning. - So see on the following illus the distribution when entering into a combo of peak/trough or trough/peak. But, we know the pattern, its archetypal form to be precise, has always the same OOE. It's T-P-T. So we have a reduced possible universe : forms in the distribution can correspond to te pattern. It's the last line of the drawing. As we can see, some patterns have higher (H) and lower (L) peaks (P) and troughs (T). As a consequence, we can either have forms showing HT&HP, HT&LP, LT&HP or LT&LP. If we remember, when talking about price, a long trend is determined by its lows being higher. And on the other hand, a short trend is determined by its highs being lower. The prior patterns exposed as possibly the archetypal can be, if filtered by the above criteria, sorted as follows : The second column from the left reminds me LATs, while the second from the right reminds me OBs. Why all this ? Simply because each time when I drew the pattern, I always put Ts and P at the same level. FCC1's N and S nodes among others, reminded me the pattern. They look to me as the most-in-the-core nodes. I was yesterday night uncapable of stop thinking about the pattern and what if I tried to move from the very first pattern, the levels of T and P of the FF. Where should be the next T and P if I want the following opposite FF to be Non-Dom inside the upper slower fractal containing it. And if I wanted this upper slower fractal to be Dom inside the third level of fractal, where would P and T be ? That's the core question. Where many things resides. I've never managed to get to the point to understand this in the core, and to draw the resulting illustration. I can feel this is about to change thanks to what is in and beyond this post. Next post will be the study of sequences of FCC1.
I am currently more than anytime in a "any item reminds me at a more or less high degree of proximity, everything" state of mind.
This post is dedicated to a study of each possible path as exposed in last Sprout’s post and in Ex Sc thread to be true, possible. From scratch of course. And before beginning, I have a remark. Atm I’m beginning this post, I feel two things concerning the following sequences : - I feel comfortable with the idea of spending some hours through the sequences in questions - I feel although I don’t feel like I’m gonna suffer too much in the attempt to drive through the nodes as exposed as true, there are some times that a given bar could do something that is not covered by a node : rephrased and better said : I think that I don’t know which node covers some situations. - Synthesis : I feel comfortable with passing through the sequences found in Sprout’s post and ExSc thread, and the uncomfort I feel is due to my current uncapacity to see the nodes that cover any situation. BUT, I know there willl always be a node to cover any state of being of any bar at anytime. 1-C>>G>>S>>K/J We’ve exited, we’ve fedback to A, ar in midday so choose C. EOB. We wait. Next bar (n+1) opens, 12sec after PRV shows volume above prior peak. G conditions are there. We enter. Then we meet lock in, so we’re at L and hold trough EOB,then proceed to Q. At next bar (n+2), PRV shows at 12sec a volume above prior trough w/ same color. We choose S. A further measurement of PRV shows volume declining below prior AND below prior trough AND color changes compared to prior. This is K happening. (here I DD if color was the same, it would be J). We feedback to A. We’ve made CGSKJ. 2-A>>D>>F We’ve just exited. We choose B. At EOB, volume is below prior. Next bar opens, PRV shows at 12sec that volume will reach LI. Prior bar was n = trough. This look back is D. Immediately, we that PRV has the opposite of prior bar. This is F state. We’ve made ADF. 3-L>>Q Sitting at G/F, volume meets LI during its formation, we’re at L. We hold throgh EOB and are at Q when next bar opens. We’ve made LQ. 4-L>>M Volume LI occurs for any F/G. And, after that, close is back to the same level as open. We have a doji. We’re at M. We’ve made LM. 5-F>>J We entered for that PRV showed an increasing volume compared to prior bar w/ color change. We’re at F. Later, the same bar’s PRV shows uncapacity from volume to exceed LI. F fails, this is J happening. We’ve made FJ. 6-Cwait>>G See 1 7-J>>A>>B J makes us exit as PRV shows nonDom. We feedback to A and being as we’re not in midday, we choose B and sit at it. We’ve made JAB. 8-S>>J>>A>>B We’ve met LI so were at L on a bar. We’ve bee, sent to Q and proceeded to S being as PRV showed exceedment of prior trough w/ same color. We’re at S. Then later in the bar, PRV shows finally volume will not meet LI and colo ris the same as prior. We’r at J which makes us exit and feedback to A and choose B cause we’re out of midday. We’ve made SJAB. 9-Lfail>>X>>A>>B We are at F/G. 4min PRV shows increasing volume but LI has not happened yet. EOB comes and LI is not met. NotL happens, Lfail in other words. We’re sent to J if volume is same color, K if color changes, via H, and feedback to A where we choose B for being out of midday. We’ve made LfailXAB. 10-B>>F>>H to X>>J>>A We’ve exited and have fedback to A. Out of midday, so we choose B. Volume is DEC at EOB. Next bar opens, colo ris opposite, 12sec PRV shows F situation. Then later PRV says no LI will happen. It’s Lfail, we go via H to X by choosing J/K and feedback to A. We’ve made BFHXJA. NB : I notice my current LOU could make me give a scenario for this sequence in which I would not say « EOB » (volume is DEC at EOB) but along the bar. I’d see F (if the other condition is met) along the same bar, therefore without to have to wait EOB. This path exposed one os the cases in which I see a case that could happen and for which I dont ‘ see the node that would cover it. What if PRV shows INC AND same color BUT below prior peak ? Neither F nor G, from what I understand, could cover this situation. Crux here. 11-B>>F>>Q>>R>>X>>J>>A W’eve exited and are at A. Out of midday, we choose B. Next bar opens. 12sec after PRV shows INC w/ change color so we’re at F. At EOB, we meet LI. We’re at L and sent to Q. 12sec after open of next bar, PRV shows INC w/ same color so we choose R. Later, PRV at any moment of its measurements (from what I think, 1min, 2min, 3min, 4min), shows finally a dropping volume below prior w/ same color. We cut to X and go to A via J. We’ve made BFQRXJA. I could add something here : in the way I understand nowadays the flow of the cycle, after being at F this could be the way things could go : At 12s PRV states INC w/ change of color : F At 1min, PRV states dec w/ change of color so X to A via H, we choose B At 2min, PRV states INC w/ color change so F At 3min, PRV states DEC w/ same color so cut to X and go to A via J through H and choose B At 4min etc. This is how I currently see the flow. It would make a loop of B>>F>>X>>J/K>>A>>B>>F>>X>>J/K>>A>B>>F etc as many times as there are PRV measurements. And to finish I might add I think PRV is to be used both for F/G AND for R/S. I am sure abot the first pair, less for second one. 12-B>>F>>Q>>S>>J>>A See 11 13-S>>V>>U>>W>>Y>>Q>>J>>A We exited at A, then chose B, met F conditions, reached LI, have been sent to Q via L, proceeded to Q and chose S because of INC volume compared to prior trough and same color. Doji does not appear. U gates to W. Lock in occurs so we’re at W. After, that, we use feedback Y box and are sent back to Q to proceed to R or S on next bar open. After any R/S choosen, PRV shows non-Dom w/ same color. We’re sent J and exit and feedback to A and choose B/C. We’ve made SVUWYQJA 14-R>>T>>U>>N>>Z We exited, been sent to A, chose B, met F conditions, LI happened, have been sent to Q, and chose R. Doji occurs, so we pass through T to use U to gate to N test. Doji test passes, close BO open level of at least one tick. We’re at Z. We’ve made RTUNZ. 15-S>>V>>U>>N>>Z If doji happens, R needs T to use U to gate to N and perform doji test. Similarly, S needs V to use U to gate to N IF doji appears. After that, let’s say N test passes. We’re at Z. We’ve made SVUNZ 16-(F+D)>>L>>M F implies D. Along the bar in which we’ve chosen F, volume meets lock in. We’re at L. Then doji appears and we’re at M, and we’re sent to N test. We’ve made F+DLM 17-(G+D)>>L>>M See above, replacing F by G. 18-F>>NotL>>M Same as two above, but Li does not occur. We cut to X through H via J/K to feedback to A. AND there is a doji along the bar. We proceed to M. M can happen and sends us to N, before or after LI. We’ve made FNotLM 19-G>>NotL>>M See above replacing F by G 20-M>>N See last four. 21-N>>P>>E>>F M has been here so Doji appeared. We’ve been sent to N. We do doji test. It fails. We use P to be back to E and choose F because circumstances orders it. We’ve made NPEF. NB : There is a subtility here that I see I do not handle and I suspect it to deal with IBGS. 22-A>>C>>G See 1 23-M>>N>>Z or fail to >>P>>E or G MNZ has been already described. Let’s say Doji test fails. So we feedback through P to E. E is both exit/choice node. This node E needs deeper study. Another post will be dedicated to it. 24-Four ways to get to M I’d say from F, G, R and S. 25-M>>N>>test pass/fail>>P>>E>>F See 23. 26-B>>F See 2 27-From trough, no direct path to J/K Trough is IDd by D. After that, we must see F/G and finally fail to be sent to J/K. So yes, J/K both need a peak before them to can appear. 29-There is no path from Node S to Node T, however there is from Node T to Node S. There is a path from R to T. And there is a path from S to V. And there is a path from T to S which is, in the case that after going through T from R, volume impedes us to go to J/K because sandwich node is here, in other words, volume is not peaking but remains above prior trough. This reminds me my last post. 30-S can go through V to ‘X’, then J or K This would be the case where S node is not there for that volume is not peaking AND it is below prior trough. OR S can go through V to U to W to Y to G I’d bet on a typo on last node and put Q. This would be clear for me. Otherwise, crux here. To be continued… Log time
Couple of things; On MADA Finite Series for Cycle 1 item20 is @S, hold for V for (J or K) @“X” or U item22 is @W,... PRV is a countdown measure; 300sec is the beginning of the bar - 12sec in the bar is 288sec, etc
Yes that's what I have for item 20. For the 22th I have : At W, hold for lock in and end of bar at Y or N (MADA 13, and [14 or 15] ). Owww.... thank you.
Today's tasks : 1- reading relevant posts on ExSc Thread 2- reading post #1656 of my Journal 3- expose certitudes and remaining doubt zones 4- do a log
Although it ends on a nice clarification, rereading that thread has provided a bit more cruxes than clarification. This is good in the sense that it makes the doubtful zones are there's bell ring. #116 : it mentions logging 2 bars and the sequence is C>>G>>S>>K>>J. I would need 2 bars for that, minimum. That’s a confirmation. Confirmation 1 #117 : Q, R and V have been triangulated on my handdrawn cycle1 and T node has been added in the center of it. Good. Confirmation 2 #127 : G, S, L and W are nodes preventing sentiment flipflop. I’m not sure in what they are so for F and G. But I do for L and W. Crux 1 #154 : Bar a had a PRV to cause a « look back one bar ». This creates uncertitude in my mind and explains why I felt my understanding of D node was wobbly. Crux 2 #156 : « An F showing anice PRV can have a shrinking PRV that falls below the lock in value before lock in or before the end of bar ». For me it’s a confirmation of the PRV’s intrabar flow usage. Confirmation 3. #165 : « Wait is « completed » by an occurrence of D node, BUT a wait can only go to an F and a C wait can only go to a G ». Confirmation of a crux… About D node. I must find the way to understand that node. #172 : 20 has a typo. It’s S node, not R. Confirmation I corrected properly. And, « you also have to change the T to a V. ». This has been cleared up thanks to last Sprout’s post. Thank you ! So at R hold for T… and at S hold for V… #181 : cycle 3 will be for connecting Dom to new Dom segments #189 : playing the R, S, N reversal game is making multi consecutive points whithout leaving market. Interesting #231 : « I suggesed drawing a bar and along the bar adding the path that the ticks follow to form the bar ». I’ll be back on this later, and for now I can say I see when recently I posted drawings with intrabar paths, it was a nicely spotted idead.. « PRV suggests the importance of temporary nature ». Confirmation 5 The four ways to go to M seem to be there : F+D to L to M, G+D to L to M, F to NotL to M, G to NotL to M. #263 : M will always be along cycles 1 to 10, the doji node ; N is the reversal node. #266 : to me it smells like pre-apparition of BO,T1 : RTL test on Cycle 4. #272 : « G is the n+1 bar and you will exit on n+2 in all likelihood. When n+2 opens, G will take you to H before or after lock in (L). From H you get to X. At x the choices ar J or K for the exit. ». Crux here : from what I’ve understood so far, and I must reconsider it, if G is the status of the bar and then the bar meets lock in it’s an L and we hold through the EOB. No way we’re going to H, cause we hold, H is for exit. Crux here. #294 : cool ride on doji/internals #295 : in cycle 1, there is no enter made on retrace/reversal except when at S node. All retraces and reversals begins after hitting J node or hitting N while coming from S. « worst case : the doji is a doji at EOB » : interesting Volume is non Dom after the N node doji sentiment reversal. #345 : we use doji for the purpose of confirmation, not event. #352 : BY PRV we know a doji will be appearing. Crux here. #496 : F either takes you out on the next bar, or you hold on R or S then go out. This creates dissonance to me. What I had understood is that at F, along the formation of the bar, PRV can decline below prior and this would be J/K. In this case, one would exit on intrabar. Or lock in happens before PRV shows decreasing volume, and L happens that sends us to Q so to next bar (n+2). Here the text states F takes us out on next bar. I see it can be on next OR current bar. Crux here. And it’s an important one. #547 : the N doji box does have fails and thus no color change as the feedback takes you to E and not through F or G. Your are at E and you go forward if the sentiment changes on the next bar, or the next bar goes nonDom. This is giving me newness about E, although I’m uncapable of understanding what is there said about E node. Crux here. #549 : From F or G, to get to J you go through H whereby ther was no lockin AND volume was below prior trough. The above sentence does not seem to me to follow J description. I must have missed something, I’ll compare and check for that. It could help. #550 : « LI stands for lock in. For a dominant bar to exist it has to be greater than the prior bar ; we know as the bar begins if this is true by looking at the PRV height behind the actual volume forming. At some point, the actual volume gets to an equal value with the prior bar ». This, to me, is a nice and clear confirmation of the use of PRV. Now the question would be when do we take into consideration the PRV value ? . In the same maneer JH states we need to let the bar mature a bit, during 12sec so until 288, I have DDd upto now that the PRV is « listened » 4 times inside a bar : at 288, 240, 180, 120 and 60sec. At 0 we have the real final volume unveiled.. #689 : « J node is a failure ». It was then very tricky and fuzzy to say for X it’s J/K failure occuring. It merely means the J/K nodes THAT ARE A FAILURE TYPE OF NODE, happen… Clarification on node X right there. Next task :