Failed. I can't prevent myself to think, read JH's posts, draw etc. I feel I'm close to get what I'm searching for. I'm struggling hard. Although I know what I need is within my grasp, I feel either I don't know it or I'm not aware that I know. JH says : The differentiator for the reversal is the relationship of P2 and P1. Further, it has to come to exist just after the sub channel first move going from pt1 to pt2 of a forming trading channel. P1 to P2 creates A-band. T2P and T2F are subfractals. Lat is subfractal. BO, T1 is a subfractal RTL safeguard. JH says : in trading, the most important is context. Context is the level of fractal. At the 5min timefram at least 3 levels of fractals are visible. This came to my mind : at a given timeframe, do we need geometry to establish rtl with pt2 outside of prior one to ID the middle of a slower level of fractal ? That was just an ultra short synthesis of what I've currently in mind. It's just an artefact sharing. I feel there is something decisive for me, from my LOD, that resides in the comprehension of it. I'm still, obvisouly, not allowing myself to unlock it. I know it's the core, the most important. I feel I'm close and I'll unlock it. I drew this to help myself : I don't know yet if it's correct. Then I went on a chart and did this, quickly: I don't know if it's correct either. I have thought about this a lot today, in some moments I could just feel the answer and a great AHA was a bout to come just until...bam...the big void. And then back to thinking, pushing it deeper, linking everything and just !!!....no, big void again. Like I'm trying to catch wind. Gonna think about what to do to either change something or simply be patient while working and get my Aha.
Just stop struggling. Feel what it feels like to orient via Be, Do, Have. Shifting your feeling will draw the next aha’s to you.
MADA is the proof. As is evident, as your level of differentiation increases, the inputs are more precise and the output of rdbms is coupling more accurately to the actual market turns. One can alway go back to the zigzag drill to see the difference in extraction potential of one’s current level of differentiation and the market’s full offer.
Thanks for the warning-advice The method is based on future cristallyzing into present. If one entered into Philosophical Radical Theory, one would get the same base : "future pre-exists to present, so in the littlest beginning move of anything, there's already its end". For a while now, in life in general, I've been verifying this dynamic more and more frequently. Thinking about someone I've not had news from for months, and the person calls me the day or two after; feeling something I've not felt for long, and the situation/context required to make me feel it appears soon after etc. The day before yesterday I heard into my mind : it would be a good thing to do the zigzag drill on your charts. At that moment I did not know why I was thinking about it. Future was cristallyzing into present. I am understanding now what carving turns means by the way .
Debrief of MADA on 09/26/19 - 46EE's IDd From the OP of crossing OB's with priorly established rtl AND use this same crossing to establish rtl when OB is the first bar after any EE, some BO,T1 spring to life and then, add some new EE's (two in this case) and finally yield some cascading effects as following :
28th Session of MADA on 09/30/19 - 36 EE's IDd On Bar 78, it's still a right mess as I've not taken the time yet to unlock the comprehension of Ja-Ah dynamic. Gonna solve it very soon.
Did not encounter consistent correction to do. Just a retro that was ID whereas it had not been triggered and a retro that was triggered that has been trated so, but was not labelled on the chart. A none of them yielded any cascading effect. Added the Zig.