Educate yourself: https://www.healthing.ca/diseases-and-conditions/coronavirus/vaccine-for-coronavirus/covid-cases-uk
You seem to be arguing with conditional strawmen... I said it would be impossible to show masks work... if you included all that data. T and... If you are commenting part of my statement... regarding the 6000 person study. https://www.thelocal.dk/20201118/da...masks-protect-wearer-from-covid-19-infection/ “The study thereby fails to confirm the expected halving of risk of infection for the wearer of the face mask, but the results could suggest a moderate level of protection of 15-20 percent,” the Danish-language press statement notes. “According to the study authors, their findings offer evidence about the degree of protection mask wearers can anticipate in a setting where others are not wearing masks and where other public health measures, including social distancing, are in effect,” reads the English-language counterpart. “The findings, however, should not be used to conclude that a recommendation for everyone to wear masks in the community would not be effective in reducing SARS-CoV-2 infections, because the trial did not test the role of masks in source control (transmission from an infected person to others) of SARS-CoV-2 infection,” it adds. Neither did the study examine the effects of face masks in s
You mean the gene therapy that is driving the mortality rate down? Goes ask India about spikes and if there needs to gene therapy for that to happen.
You’re so stupid. Again with this “masks do not protect the wearer” stuff. We know. Masks reduce spread, not contraction.
Cases are down 90% in India since May. Are they even 8% vaxxed? Thank Ivermectin. https://www.thedesertreview.com/new...cle_6a3be6b2-c31f-11eb-836d-2722d2325a08.html
Excellent posting!! In the end, it will turn out that Trump was right about Invermectin, Regeneron, Hydroxychloroquine etc.