See post #33 this thread, and you will see the raw data the 0.054% comes from. Were you to compute the % of doubly vaccinated that have died from Covid relative to the total number of Doubly vaccinated in the UK, and not just the confirmed cases, you'd of course get a much smaller percent. I think I already made this point; it would be a vanishingly small percent. The 0.054 number , although close to zero, is relative to the number of total cases reported and not relative to the number of doubly vaccinated, which of course is by now quite a large number; much, much larger than the number of cases included in the study I referred to in post #33. We know from the data provided to the FDA, when Moderna and Pfizer were applying for emergency authorization, that these new RNA vaccines were being reported as ~90+% effective, which is outstanding as vaccines go. These RNA vaccines are just amazing!!! Is there anything else I can help you with today?
The lack of evidence found by the UNC researchers of human tampering with Covid genetics is easily explained. They were looking for the wrong thing! They should have looked for rogue tracts of nucleic acids coding for bamboo carbohydrates.
Well done. Those numbers I quoted are from the UK. How perceptive of you. If you want CDC data, I'll trade you some for some Gondor data from Middle Earth.
But that’s not the question. The question was - how many double vaxxed are infected and dying when compared to unvaxxed infected and dying. IN THE US. Because the number of unvaccinated people dying is also close to zero. As it always has been. Unless you are old, sick and fat.
Yup. That’s what I was saying this whole fucking time. You would get a D or worse in your virology lab. Get back to the library.
What’s your honorarium and in what subject? Where is the source of 12 people dying from the vax? How was the J&J picnic this year? Did they offer free stabbings at the softball game?