You are definitely up to something, Hels, with the study of the psyche of other market participants. However, I doubt you can build trading strategies on what BS thinks of the market and his calls. I am more interested by quantifiable statistics such as the VIX and the VXN for market sentiments , as well as the number of up days/down days, etc.. The fact of the matter is that this board is quite anoymous and we have no clue what people actually think and do. Are they clowning around , trading real money and if yes, how much? I am not sure I can believe you bought some stocks because of this thread !
Well, I have to admit I'm getting more concerned about the market, and people like Blue make me happier about it. When I first came to this forum, it seemed everyone was bearish. The majority of the threads were top calls, "the S&P will top out at blahblah", and people were bullying bulls, not bears. The market kept rising. The one bull who was unabashedly bullish (StockTr3der) was being pounded by nearly everyone. People were saying the SAME things said on this thread about Blue, the super bear. My first post here was really to defend bulls, and it wasn't long ago. My first post here stated my unbiased bullishness. 2 months ago, I was REALLY bullish. When I got here, I was even MORE bullish... because so many people were turning bearish. I knew from that that there were still a few good months to go in the rally. And I've made some good money these last 2 months. The entire tide has turned, you can see it on this forum alone. Now, the one bear who is willing to admit his bearishness is jumped on and smothered by the bulls. Instead of recession news and how the dollar was falling, and how gold, bonds and emerging funds were the place to put your $$, today's news is.... "there's more run in the bull market". There are a lot more stock pick advice. "The DOW will lead the way". While this doesn't prove anything, and I DO still think there's more to go to this bull market, I'm getting nervous and for the last week have been more nervous. The market is 100% about timing. Every stock eventually goes up, and eventually goes down. The ONLY thing that matters is when. Fortunes ride on when, and being wrong 1 day can cost a lot of money. The only true 'edge' is someone sitting at a trading desk who can see all the orders/stops/limits before they're filled, or works for the company who's about to announce something no one else knows... and they can buy and sell before the news is out. So how do we gauge WHEN the market's going to do what? Think about it and let me know how you do it.
It's all in the charts Here's one take(grain of salt). November 2006 As we approach the top of this bull run from 2003 the question naturally arises as to how big a drop will we see in 2007. Will it be a very modest 15%-20% or a full-fledged bear market 40%. The shape and pattern of the drop is also of concern since a drifting bear market is easy to trade but a 1987 style collapse and panic could catch a lot of investors off guard and result in a huge derivative blowup. In my work this is a two or five-year primary bear market starting so the drop ultimately will be quite large but first we have to find out where the top is. Natural squares of numbers usually give pretty good approximations and 111 x 111 is 12,321 for the Dow Jones and the 111.50 squared is 12,432. The S&P squares are 37.50 x 37.50 =1406, and 38 x 38, which is the magical 1444 number, with the midpoint 1425. The seasonal date for the top is December 5th and these numbers were hit on this date so thatââ¬â¢s a strong warning if the market trades below those numbers for more than a week. Historically when you have this much upside momentum you get a one to two week scary plunge and then another spike to a slight new high. That high if it comes would be January 3rd or 8th. That was the scenario from 1972 to the ââ¬â¢73 January top and that would also tie in with the year 2000 with the Dow Jones January 14th high and first top for the S&P on January 3rd. The ââ¬Ëfoolerââ¬â¢ in 2000 was the huge short squeeze in March for the record S&P high and this next year has another top due for March. The million dollar question is whether the March high is a lower top or the primary one. My thinking is that it is a lower ââ¬Ëright shoulderââ¬â¢ like the 1937 pattern but there are those who think the four-year cycle hit early this year in July and will go straight up into March. Thatââ¬â¢s a 30% chance so Iââ¬â¢d only short prices below the December 5th levels or the January 8th levels. Iââ¬â¢m a believer in the theory that the four year cycle did not hit in July and came early, but actually came late in December and itââ¬â¢s a classic ââ¬Åbottoms to bottoms to topââ¬Â pattern with lows in October ââ¬â¢98, October 2002 and a potential high in December 2006. The long term cycles are quite obvious to me with the real estate collapse and weekly economic numbers getting worse, not better. Christmas sales will be another key and I suspect they will be weak. The bond market wants to trade higher and thatââ¬â¢s in the face of a weak US Dollar so foreign selling is more than absorbed or not afraid of the Dollar. I think the bond bulls know the real economic story out there and itââ¬â¢s not pretty. Coming from a trading background on Wall Street I always look for the technical arbitrage reasons for why a market doesnââ¬â¢t do what itââ¬â¢s supposed to do. It took me years to fully understand why and how the Wall Street firms could willfully manipulate the markets with futures, options, and ETFââ¬â¢s , and why they basically have unlimited buying power when they do that. In our present situation it seems more than plausible that big institutions put on large short stock baskets near the June / July lows expecting a big second leg down and they were forced to go long the December futures to lock in those shorts until the inevitable correction came. When you donââ¬â¢t get a correction and the market goes straight up it usually goes to the quarterly futures expiration when those shorts are forced to cover. If that covering comes at year end it can extend the up move, until just after year end. The last time we saw something like that was the year 2003 where everyone went short in June with the big bond market high and they were not only trapped until the December expiration but those shorts covering before year end capitulated the market much higher the last two weeks of the year. There is a 40% chance we could see a replay this year. December Activity Calendar DATE UP /DOWN DAY DAILY WEEKLY HOURLY 11 D * * 11 12 D 10 13 U 2 14 U 11 15 U * 10 18 D 3 19 U 1 20 D 11 21 D * * 11 22 U 3 26 D 3 27 U 12 28 U * 1 29 U 3 Notes: U means up day, D means down day. Trend changes indicated by the * will generally be more accurate than the frequent U/D day indications and will usually trend in the same direction until the next *. Hourly turns are given in local New York City (Eastern) times, i.e.10=10 AM EST. Cycle turns: KO 12/11 GM 12/11 MSFT 12/12 SLB 12/12 PG 12/12 EBAY 12/13 BIDU 12/13 AAPL 12/13 INTC 12/13 AMGN 12/13 CAT 12/14 GOOG 12/14 KBH 12/14 CSCO 12/15 EK 12/15 LEH 12/22 GE 12/22 APA 12/26 AIG 12/27 CME 12/27 MMM 12/27 XOM 12/27 ALL 12/28 AMAT 12/28 FDX 12/29 IBM 12/29 EWJ 12/29 Summary The market is still in a rally phase but at an important cyclic time period. Resistance is 1416 and 1425, then 1444 S&P. A break of 1406 S&P would imply a test of 1365 which is now the 1 point per day angle from 3/12/2003 and when broken implies a new bear market. Of course you know that my favorite master cycle is the 100 year cycle and this year marks the 100th anniversary of ââ¬ËThe Financial Panic of 1907ââ¬Â. Could be a derivative blowup year- 1887, 1907, 1937, 1987, 2007?
can someone summarize the previous post for me. it was absolutely too long for a message board (try a blog). took two minutes just to scroll down the post.
This was a great post! I don't agree with all of the analysis (Eg. Square numbers are okay, but when we start squaring fractions, isn't that extreme?) but I do agree with some, and I appreciate the insight! Good luck with your call.
Let me just add that I don't think we will have the "typical double bottom". i.e. A santa rally (or what you call the 2003 short squeeze) till sometime in Jan before the drop. 1) Santa came in 2003, 2004, 2005. I think he is going to take a break this time. 2) I mentioned "typical double bottom" because usually we have a drop till the week Christmas, then a rally till the first week of Jan, then a fall. Since, did not have the drop till Christmas, the pattern is broken. My calculations are for a 20% chance, not 40% chance of Santa happening. My bullish case would be the 1992-1993 senario. My bearish case would be the 1990-1991 senario. The 1990 senario would mean that the peak is the turning point is pretty much now. Santa is not coming.
can someone make a version of this with the proper line of thinking along this timeline? might help me address issues with my trading style.