You are the only asshole that has ever stated that. You purposely lie about immunity and antibodies. Nobody would ever say those whose antibodies fade fast can easily be reinfected...because they have the strongest immune systems...why do you create fake science and lies.
There are multiple studies showing people can easily be reinfected after natural infection after their antibody immunity fades. In 40% of people natural antibody immunity does not last 6 months.
Michigan Hospital System Says Workers With COVID-19 Natural Immunity Don’t Need Vaccine https://m.theepochtimes.com/michiga...tural-immunity-dont-need-vaccine_3995988.html
So they will have to submit to an antibody test to prove they are immune — which is to prove they have sufficient antibody levels for immunity. And will require regular follow-up antibody tests. As I have stated earlier this is the only type of policy that makes sense in regards to “natural immunity”. Seeing that it does not last 6 months in 40% of those infected.
show a single study which states that 40% of those with natural immunity have been reinfected within 6 months. you are lying your ass off and just made that shit up because you are an anti science anti data liar. And... that is not the same as showing antibodies fade... There are other mechanisms with provide natural immunity.... so you just like your ass off. Not a single study you have ever produced said anything like your lie.
I posted a study many times showing that 40% of those who were infected with Covid-19 do not have necessary antibody levels after 6 months to prevent reinfection -- while responding to you. At this point it has been posted over half a dozen times -- Go back and read the past posts with the study. There are other studies showing re-infection levels of those who had Covid before which also have been posted. I suggest you go read them. And while you are at it -- you should go read what respected experts have to say about your "natural immunity" nonsense... https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...unist-collaborator.360828/page-3#post-5456888
So... All acquired immunity is natural. The body develops antibodies keyed on the spike samples or dead virus provided through vaccination. These start to mutate as all antibodies do and get ahead of some possible mutations. It's not as many as a live infection, as the spike just a subset of the virus structure. Exposure to the live virus simply adds keys to the library and mutants off this follow. The vaccinated are in the same position exposed to the live virus or variant as unvaccinated except they have some recognition from the starting block. They will still develop antibodies keyed off the live virus and mutants of these follow to broaden the protection. They will not get as ill but may get a little symptomatic. People who get just the live virus are however shedding far more on average. Any arguments against this? I'm writing up a thing in Spanish for a friend's kids science fair. There will be an animation.