[/QUOTE] That table actually supports the fact that blacks commit more hate crimes as % of their population. Blacks make up 16% of total US population but commit double the crimes. Whites make up 75% and account for roughly 2/3 of hate crimes per their % of total population.
According to The FBI the majority of hate crimes are committed by white people,that is an undisputed fact.
If the question is who commits the most, why do you have to dig for % of population because you dont want to admit whites commit more hate crimes. % of population is not even an issue here. If Whites are 75% of the population but commit 10,000 rapes, are you going to say that is not so bad since it is only .0004% of their population? Out of the 6400 hate crimes more than half are committed by whites. that is what the data shows plain and simple. Does not mean ONLY whites commit hate crimes.... does not mean hate crimes would go away if whites stopped committing them....does not mean 6400 is a high or low number on its own....does not mean that the victims of hate crimes are unimportant... If I say more than 50% of cancers are breast cancer are you going to get offended and claim testicular cancer is important also!!!!!
If whites are 75%, you'd expect them to commit 75% of hate crimes, not 66%. Likewise, if blacks make up 13.6% you'd expect them to commit 13.6%, not 23.9%. See how that works?
According to The FBI the majority of hate crimes are committed by white people,that is an undisputed fact.
No I dont see how if whites are 75% of the population they are required or expected to commit 75% of the hate crimes... Since there are more whites around walking in the streets that puts the burden on them to do everything at 75%? what back of the matchbook university did you attend and study statistics? holy shit.