All the 911 calls and physical evidence fully supports Zimmerman's version of events without exception.
So you are trying to stretch this situation to somehow be equivalent to Emmett Till --- well it is not and your suggesting it does simply undermines an assertions you make on the subject.
Again, you're attempting to move the goal post. My response was specific to something specific you said. I did not respond regarding any of the examples you cite above. @gwb-trading "If the information you provided to an 911 operator is honest & correct then no jury will even consider convicting you for following someone suspicious in your own neighborhood." I never said anything whatsoever about convictions. I spoke towards the illegality of something you claimed to be legal in your area. Period, point blank. But to respond simply anyway: Did OJ, not being convicted of murder, mean murder is legal. That's how your mind continually twists and conflates stuff. Going forward, try to stay focused, and stop
The situation where law enforcement lies about black crimes all the time? Were you in a comma these last 3 yrs?
When it was Zimmerman chasing Martin who was trying to get away it does not.And the 911 call shows Zimmerman was told to stop chasing Martin.
"I never said anything whatsoever about convictions." Say's the guy who previously said: "They hope to find jurors like you." Yeah.. we all know who is attempting to move the goalposts here.
There are entire threads dealing with the information and evidence from this case. Go back and read them if you wish to educate yourself. It is not worth the time & effort to go through the entire "Zimmerman thread" again attempting to "re-litigate" the Zimmerman situation. Clearly you are stuck on your opinion and the justice system is stuck on reality -- as shown by the verdict.
No,the stalking requires previous contact and the case of the burglars in your neighborhood being caught by the citizen who chased them in his car and on foot.