Democrats doing their best to pin this on Republicans when the attacker is obviously, an extreme liberal Democrat who is reported as being friends with the Pelosis? Smacks of another Jussie Smollet concoction. Maybe, he wanted more monies and Paul Pelosi was not giving him any more monies.
I've only seen evidence in the past tense provided about those claims. This is a literal case of beggars can't be choosers when it comes to housing too.
I wouldn't do what Buy1Sell2 does...say "I'll reserve judgment" or "Let us wait until all the facts come out" involving election fraud but then continue posting messages by particular sources as if this is what is to be believed instead of posting info from both sides even though nobody here has any connection with the ongoing investigation. The above tactic seems to be very popular about other breaking news stories here at Elitetrader.com that has nothing to do with election fraud but more to do with crime stories...forgetting that a crime had occurred...someone was injured or killed. wrbtrader
I'm just making a compilation of the sources questioning the official narrative. There are plenty of links to the story the way the MSM is portraying it. None of us is in a position to be certain as to what happened at this point.
what's the point of using trash sources just to be a reactionary/contrarian though? Find holes using reputable sources at least.
However we can be sure the narrative that Paul Pelosi was meeting a gay lover is pure right-wing batshiat insanity. Anyone pushing this fake narrative -- without any evidence whatsoever -- is plainly a conspiracy nutcase. Let's take a look at how the right-wing ecosystem creates this type of alternate reality. Thread Reader - https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1586740957000728577.html
I'm not sure what exactly is your reference to the "official narrative" but my reference was a news conference by a spokesperson (he was in a police uniform) for that particular police department that specifically stated what happen and that there's an "ongoing investigation" in contrast to people like you posting links to sources NOT part of the ongoing investigation and by alternative news sources to contrast my below news sources. Sources: Fox News, CBC News, and CNN The above sources were very similar and showed the same police officer spokesperson speaking about the attack on Paul Pelosi. Anything else from other sources, I was not aware of until those here at ET decided to use OTHER SOURCES that are gossiping as if you're doing your own selective investigation...no relationship to the official narrative by the below police spokesperson that clearly states it's an ongoing investigation. Simply, if you're using links not from the police department about their "ongoing investigation"... it's not the official narrative until the police department provides an update. With that said, the same police spokesperson in the below videos was shown on Fox, CNN, and CBC News. I don't use alternative news sources for criminal cases especially when the police have not released all the details and charged someone with a crime. Are the below sources what you refer to as MSM ??? If you're truly going to reserve judgment ...just stick to what the police spokesperson has stated, wait for charges to be announced if any and then you can pass judgement with alternative news sources all the way to a criminal trial. CNN News Fox News CBC News https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/paul-pelosi-home-attack-1.6632866 wrbtrader
In this NBC News video, it's not clear if the glass in the door was broken from the outside or inside. One would think a house of such prominent people would have alarms that notify police. And the doors with glass would be more secure with double cylinder deadbolts to prevent them being opened from the outside if the glass breaks. And who was the mysterious third person who let the police in? It seems like there is more to this event than what's been reported.
But in another post you wrote he was homeless. How can a homeless person have a home with a window? Or you know, someone else in the house who was living there could have done it.