The entire purpose of DOGE is not to reallocate funds; it is to reduce the budget by $2 trillion. Certainly some programs will get restored when Republicans in Congress from impacted states scream loudly enough about them -- but the overall intent is cut, cut, cut.
Not the entire purpose. Clearly some actions are to protect Musk's access to government money, both by protecting in whole his contracts, and by eliminating agencies who examine his operations.
Yes, and next Musk is having DOGE go after NASA so he can put them out of business and direct all U.S. government space funding to his own company. Elon Musk’s DOGE Minions Have Found Their New Target: NASA Conflict of interest, much? https://newrepublic.com/post/191510/elon-musk-doge-nasa
Yes but every dfficult plan will ultimately require some side benefits to keep the masses on board. And so it is with the doge plan. It cannot all be slash and burn. Some percentage of it must be areas where the people see the benefits concretely so that they keep cheering you on. Similarly, when I was in the corporate world some of us who survived the ulgiest cuts got pay raises. Also, even though it is larger discussion than I am going to get into through posts, note that some of the expenditures that can and should be made are nevertheless net positive savings to the system overall. Going back to the homelessness expenditures as an example, there is a massive, massive jungle of waste and bureaucracy that goes with that but in the end does not do squat. In many areas you can cut the whole bureaucracy but also increase targeted expenditures on areas that do matter. This is called management.
It's obvious that like Trump you have no clue what you are talking about on these topics. I'm sure you've never held a meaningful mgmt role in the corporate world.
There will be a monsoon of people being displaced by Trump policy in the coming months. And when people lose their jobs or their jobs become precarious, they often get angry. Your idea that Trump will do the right thing according to some moral code is quaint. But it's all ok I guess as long as the 1%ers get their tax cut .
Nope. The only regrets Trump supporters will be having, so far, is their support for Andrew Tate. It can't be many, but enough to cause deep embarrassment. It might take a while longer for the stench to rise at the relationship intersection of the venn diagram.
Let's see what Trump does with a large portion of his time as President. You would think that he would focus on doing his job at least 5 days per week. Americans baffled as Donald Trump has spent 24% of his presidency golfing so far A site tracking Donald Trump's golfing habits claims the president has gone golfing on seven out of the first 29 days of his second term after playing an estimated 261 rounds in his first term https://www.irishstar.com/news/us-news/donald-trump-golfing-tacker-usa-34698276
Well... then the Republican legislators should not have supported Trump for President. FAFO. GOP lawmakers are ‘grumbling’ about Musk’s ‘poorly executed’ mass government cuts ‘It’s not efficiency, it’s not output,’ one Republican senator griped https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ics/elon-musk-donald-trump-doge-b2699691.html