Madoff Fund - SEC relationship

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by AMT4SWA, Feb 6, 2009.

  1. Bush SEC Holdovers Cite Executive Privilege, Refuse to Answer Questions at Madoff Hearing

    Susie Madrak
    Crooks and Liars
    February 6, 2009


    David Sirota on yesterday’s hearing about Bernie Madoff:

    At a contentious Financial Services Committee hearing today about the failure of the Securities and Exchange Commission to prevent the Bernie Madoff scandal, the SEC’s General Counsel cited executive privilege as reason that he and the SEC’s enforcement branch were refusing to answer congressional inquiries. You can watch the video here - ( http://www.infowars.com/bush-sec-ho...refuse-to-answer-questions-at-madoff-hearing/ ) the executive privilege issue comes at about 5 minutes and 15 seconds into the clip.

    As you’ll see, SEC officials refuse to answer the committee’s basic questions about the Madoff scandal, and the agency’s acting general counsel, Andy Vollmer (a Bush holdover and maxed-out donor to John McCain’s presidential campaign) explicitly cites executive privilege as his legal rationale for refusing to provide basic information to federal lawmakers.

    Congress has a constitutional obligation to engage in basic fact finding, both in order to legislate reforms at the SEC and to publicly expose how our economy was destroyed by sharks like Madoff. Now, Bush holdovers at the SEC are using executive powers - powers that are now President Obama’s - to prevent Democratic lawmakers from doing their job.
    ******************************************************************

    So the SEC seems to have "allowed" the Madoff scam to go on and today I hear info about Madoff - AIPAC ties for cycling funds to politicians.....this story is finally starting to make some sense to me now. :D
     
  2. I wonder if "executive privilege" is equivalent to "taking the 5th" regarding not incriminating the sec..
     
  3. We will see....:D